You are working on Staging1

2023 Women’s NCAA Division I Champs: Day 3 Ups/Downs

2023 NCAA WOMEN’S SWIMMING AND DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

For those unfamiliar with swimming terminology, the concept of “Ups” and “Downs” is a good way to track which teams performed best at prelims. In prelims, swimmers qualify for one of two finals heats: the top 8 finishers make the A final and places 9 through 16, the B final. In finals, swimmers are locked into their respective final, meaning a swimmer in the B heat (spots 9-16) can only place as high as 9th or as low as 16th, even if they put up the fastest or slowest time of any heat in the final.

With that in mind, we’ll be tracking “Ups” and “Downs” after each prelims session. “Up” refers to swimmers in the A final, and “Down” to swimmers in the B final.

Credit to Andrew Mering for running the numbers.

~Updated with diving~

Just like day 1, Virginia has the most A finalists as well as the most total finalists. Stanford and NC State also have the most total finalists with Virginia as all three teams have nine swims total tonight.

If things go exactly how they did this morning, Virginia is once again expected to add the most points with 127 total. Stanford also looks to battle back against Texas for second place, as the teams are expected to be separated by about 20 points tonight.

After a relay DQ last night, NC State looks to rebound today as they also have nine final swims tonight. NC State joins Virginia as the only team with a swimmer in every event tonight.

Ups/Downs

All 400 IM 100 Fly 200 Free 100 Breast 100 Back 3 mtr Diving
UVA 7/2 2/0 1/1 2/0 1/0 1/1 0/0
Stanford 6/3 1/1 2/0 2/1 0/0 1/1 0/0
NC State 4/5 1/0 1/1 0/1 1/1 1/2 0/0
Texas 4/2 0/0 1/0 0/1 2/0 1/0 0/1
Louisville 3/3 0/1 1/2 1/0 0/0 0/0 1/0
Ohio State 3/3 0/1 1/0 0/1 2/0 0/0 0/1
Tennessee 3/0 0/0 0/0 1/0 1/0 1/0 0/0
Florida 2/4 2/1 0/1 0/1 0/0 0/1 0/0
Indiana 2/3 0/1 0/0 1/0 0/1 0/0 1/1
USC 2/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/1 0/0 1/1
Minnesota 2/1 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/1
California 1/3 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/0 1/0 0/0
UNC 1/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/1 1/0
Kentucky 1/1 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1
Texas A&M 1/1 0/0 0/0 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/1
Wisconsin 1/1 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0 1/0 0/0
Miami (FL) 1/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0 1/0
LSU 1/0 0/0 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
Alabama 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0 0/0
South Carolina 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0
Arizona 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0
UCLA 0/1 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
Miami (Ohio) 0/1 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
Auburn 0/1 0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
Northwestern 0/1 0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0
VT 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0
Michigan 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0
FIU 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0
Duke 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0
Georgia 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0
Akron 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1 0/0
Purdue 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1

Scored Prelims

Scored Prelim Scored Prelim + actual
1. UVA: 127.0 1. UVA: 335.5
2. Stanford: 107.0 2. Texas: 239.0
3. NC State: 86.5 3. Stanford: 213.0
4. Texas: 77.0 4. Louisville: 165.0
5. Ohio State: 56.0 5. NC State: 152.5
6. Louisville: 48.0 6. Ohio State: 149.0
7. Florida: 44.0 7. Indiana: 121.5
8. Tennessee: 44.0 8. Florida: 120.0
9. USC: 44.0 9. Tennessee: 105.0
10. Indiana: 38.5 10. UNC: 104.0
11. UNC: 31.0 11. California: 101.0
12. California: 27.0 12. USC: 81.0
13. Minnesota: 26.0 13. LSU: 75.0
14. Miami (FL): 20.0 14. Georgia: 71.5
15. South Carolina: 20.0 15. Alabama: 67.0
16. Kentucky: 18.0 16. Wisconsin: 67.0
17. Wisconsin: 18.0 17. Kentucky: 44.0
18. Arizona: 17.0 18. Minnesota: 37.0
19. LSU: 13.0 19. Miami (FL): 36.0
20. Texas A&M: 13.0 20. Arizona: 34.0
21. Alabama: 11.0 21. South Carolina: 29.0
22. Michigan: 7.0 22. VT: 20.0
23. Auburn: 6.0 23. Texas A&M: 20.0
24. FIU: 6.0 24. Michigan: 17.0
25. UCLA: 5.0 25. Duke: 16.0
26. Northwestern: 5.0 26. Arkansas: 12.0
27. Georgia: 5.0 27. UCLA: 9.0
28. Duke: 3.0 28. Auburn: 8.0
29. VT: 2.0 29. Florida St: 7.0
30. Akron: 2.0 30. Northwestern: 7.0
31. Purdue: 2.0 31. FIU: 6.0
32. Miami (Ohio): 1.0 32. Arizona State: 4.0
33. Utah: 2.0
34. Akron: 2.0
35. Purdue: 2.0
36. Miami (Ohio): 1.0

 

15
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

15 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joel
1 year ago

Thanks for explaining ups and downs Anya. Genuinely wasn’t sure.

Weinstein-Smith-Ledecky-Sims
1 year ago

Barring a collapse on Day 4, the University of Virginia should accrue at least 500 points.

Yikes
1 year ago

Did UVA not bring Sophia Wilson? Would have thought she’d have qualified in the IMs

Greg
Reply to  Yikes
1 year ago

She just missed out on qualifying

Yikes
Reply to  Greg
1 year ago

Gotcha, thanks!

CavaDore
1 year ago

3 Meter Diving prelims complete: Texas 0/1 (what happened to that high scoring Texas diving contingent people were commenting so much about?), Louisville 1/0, Ohio State 0/1, Indiana 1/1, UVA/Stanford/NC State all 0/0

Bevo
Reply to  CavaDore
1 year ago

Pac fans are giddy with excitement

Vaswammer
Reply to  CavaDore
1 year ago

They did score 21 last night, +4 from the 17 they had on the 1-meter in 2022.

They had 31 on the 3-meter last year, so will be at least -22 on that event y/y.

Where Texas divers really did damage last year was on the platform, with three A finalists and 42 points.

Vaswammer
Reply to  Vaswammer
1 year ago

Meanwhile, really bad luck by Lizzy Kaye to qualify 17th (!!) in both diving events so far.

ACC fan
1 year ago

Nice rebound by NC STATE after losing 54 points on the relay DQ. UVA so dominant. Louisville cranking. ACC rocking!

Swimmer.
Reply to  ACC fan
1 year ago

How do you lose 54 points in one race

Snarky
Reply to  Swimmer.
1 year ago

Relay DQ. But not that many points.

cbswims
Reply to  Swimmer.
1 year ago

NCS lost 28 points with the DQ. Perhaps ACC fan is including the net gain from other teams / positional loss?

Another coach
Reply to  Swimmer.
1 year ago

It is wildly fun how important relay points are. DQ changes complexion of the meet.

Last edited 1 year ago by Another coach
Lab Counter
Reply to  Swimmer.
1 year ago

They were maybe scoring A B C heat scoring like at conference? Just a guess

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »