You are working on Staging1

2023 Women’s NCAAs: Day 2 Ups/Downs

2023 NCAA WOMEN’S SWIMMING AND DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

For those unfamiliar with swimming terminology, the concept of “Ups” and “Downs” is a good way to track which teams performed best at prelims. In prelims, swimmers qualify for one of two finals heats: the top 8 finishers make the A final and places 9 through 16, the B final. In finals, swimmers are locked into their respective final, meaning a swimmer in the B heat (spots 9-16) can only place as high as 9th or as low as 16th, even if they put up the fastest or slowest time of any heat in the final.

With that in mind, we’ll be tracking “Ups” and “Downs” after each prelims session. “Up” refers to swimmers in the A final, and “Down” to swimmers in the B final.

Credit to Andrew Mering for running the numbers.

Women – Team Rankings – Through Event 2

  1. Virginia 80
  2. Texas  64
  3. California  56
  4. Stanford 52
  5. NC State  44
  6. Tennessee  40
  7. Louisville  40
  8. Ohio St   38
  9. Indiana 34
  10. Georgia  30
  11. Florida 26
  12. Alabama 24
  13. UNC   22
  14. Wisconsin  18
  15. Kentucky 14
  16. Southern California 14
  17. Virginia Tech 6
  18. Michigan  6
  19. Arkansas   4
  20. UCLA     4
  21. Auburn   2
  22. Duke    2

~Updated with Diving~

Virginia holds a 16-point lead through day 1 and they will look to expand upon their lead in day 2. The Hoos will have the most finalists tonight, as well as the most A final swims. Notably, Virginia has the three A finalists in the 200 IM, so expect them to create a big lead after that.

Texas and Louisville also lead the way with three A final swims and one B final swim tonight. Texas has two A finalists in the 500 free and Virginia has none so it is most likely that Texas will take over the lead for a short time.

Texas has a diver in each of the A and B finals, helping boost them to only be one A finalist behind Virginia.

Ups/Downs

All 500 Free 200 IM 50 Free 1 mtr Diving
UVA 5/2 0/1 3/0 2/1 0/0
Texas 4/2 2/0 1/1 0/0 1/1
Louisville 3/1 0/0 1/0 2/1 0/0
Georgia 2/2 2/0 0/1 0/1 0/0
Wisconsin 2/0 1/0 1/0 0/0 0/0
LSU 2/0 0/0 0/0 1/0 1/0
UNC 2/0 0/0 0/0 1/0 1/0
Florida 1/3 1/2 0/0 0/0 0/1
Indiana 1/3 1/0 0/1 0/2 0/0
Stanford 1/2 0/1 1/1 0/0 0/0
NC State 1/2 0/0 0/2 1/0 0/0
Ohio State 1/2 0/0 0/0 1/1 0/1
Alabama 1/1 1/0 0/0 0/1 0/0
Duke 1/0 0/0 1/0 0/0 0/0
Miami (FL) 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0
Kentucky 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0
Arizona 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0
Minnesota 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0
USC 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0
Tennessee 0/4 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/0
California 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/0 0/0
Texas A&M 0/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/2
Arizona State 0/1 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0
South Carolina 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1
Florida St 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1
Utah 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/1

Scored Prelims

Women Scored Prelim + actual
1. UVA: 95.0 1. UVA: 175.0
2. Texas: 71.5 2. Texas: 135.5
3. Louisville: 52.5 3. Louisville: 92.5
4. Georgia: 41.5 4. Stanford: 78.5
5. UNC: 35.0 5. Georgia: 71.5
6. LSU: 30.0 6. Tennessee: 66.0
7. Wisconsin: 28.0 7. California: 62.0
8. Stanford: 26.5 8. Ohio State: 61.0
9. Tennessee: 26.0 9. NC State: 59.5
10. Ohio State: 23.0 10. UNC: 57.0
11. Alabama: 22.0 11. Indiana: 53.0
12. Florida: 19.5 12. Alabama: 46.0
13. Indiana: 19.0 13. Wisconsin: 46.0
14. Miami (FL): 17.0 14. Florida: 45.5
15. Kentucky: 16.0 15. Kentucky: 30.0
16. NC State: 15.5 16. LSU: 30.0
17. Arizona: 15.0 17. USC: 25.0
18. Duke: 12.0 18. Miami (FL): 17.0
19. Minnesota: 12.0 19. Arizona: 15.0
20. USC: 11.0 20. Duke: 14.0
21. South Carolina: 9.0 21. Minnesota: 12.0
22. Texas A&M: 7.0 22. South Carolina: 9.0
23. California: 6.0 23. Texas A&M: 7.0
24. Florida St: 6.0 24. Michigan: 6.0
25. Utah: 3.0 25. VT: 6.0
26. Arizona State: 1.0 26. Florida St: 6.0
27. Arkansas: 4.0
28. UCLA: 4.0
29. Utah: 3.0
30. Auburn: 2.0
31. Arizona State: 1.0

So far numerous teams are out-performing their seeded points. Virginia and Indiana lead the way there with +14. Other teams performing well so far are Wisconsin and Louisville.

Points vs Seeds:

  • Virginia +14
  • Texas -2.25
  • Louisville +12.25
  • Georgia+8.25
  • Wisconsin +13
  • Stanford +.5
  • Tennessee -16
  • Alabama +10.5
  • Indiana +14

37
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

37 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Andrew
1 year ago

Stanford needs to be careful, Louisville could jump them for 3rd

Jimbo
1 year ago

6 for Longhorns.

oxyswim
1 year ago

Indiana women finishing in the bottom 3 spots of diving prelims is brutal.

Andrew
Reply to  oxyswim
1 year ago

I wonder what happened? Their divers always show up

oxyswim
1 year ago

Texas goes 1/1 on diving

Nathan
1 year ago

is there a timeline for finals?

Gummy Shark
1 year ago

Stanford laid an egg.

Swammer
Reply to  Gummy Shark
1 year ago

So did cal

JimSwim22
1 year ago

I will forever hate the loss of prelim relays. Required toughness and added excitement to get in to A or B slots

Lab Counter
Reply to  JimSwim22
1 year ago

I agree that it makes them softer but I am old school! It does make for a more even playing field in that teams that are very deep and can sub some prelim swimmers won’t have an advantage to those schools that aren’t so deep!
I would like to go back to just a 3 day format and all relays are prelim/finals! But I am in a minority and I don’t have to swim 14 races in 3 days!

Not-so-Silent Observer
Reply to  JimSwim22
1 year ago

I do feel that relays are less exciting when a relay in heat 1 could win… But they don’t actually race the 2nd and 3rd place teams.
It drains some of the added excitement brought about by qualifying for the final.

Vaswammer
1 year ago

Psych sheets had Virginia 4/2 in today’s events and Texas 3/3, but prelims were 5/2 and 3/1, respectively. That’s a swing of Virginia +25ish.

Random123
Reply to  Vaswammer
1 year ago

Virginia will win comfortably

ACCSWIMFAN
Reply to  Random123
1 year ago

I think they will definitely win but Texas is on track to get 1-2 A finalist in diving so it really is 5/1 or 4/2 for them so not as big of a difference once diving is factored in

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »