You are working on Staging1

NFHS Confirms Proposed Rule Changes for 2017-2018

We reported in late March that the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) had proposed rule changes for the 2017-2018 season during their rule committee meeting from March 19-21.

The NFHS has recently confirmed the proposed changes, which will take effect this coming fall. The committee cites risk minimization as the primary reason for the changes.

Seven total changes have been made, highlighted by changes that address the definition of season culminating meets and relay starts. Beginning next season, rule 1-3-12 will say that state associations must now identify what their culminating meets are that will take place in the championship meet format. This change comes due to NFHS recognizing the extreme variation between each individual state’s meet schedule and format.

According to Sandy Searcy, NFHS director of sports and liaison to the Swimming and Diving Rules Committee, “the committee agreed that state associations are in the best position to determine which competitions must adhere to the championship meet format. The language also allows non-championship meets to be conducted using the championship meet format.”

Another notable confirmed rule change deals with clarifying relay starts for swimmers after the lead off. The new rule, 8-3-5c, states that a swimmer must have one foot touching the block in front of the starting wedge.

The other confirmed changes are:

  • Rule 9-5-2, which addresses the approach and hurdle requirements in diving. This clarifies the intent for hops, leaps and/or jumps to count toward the three-step forward approach requirement.
  • Rule 3-3-2a, which provides consistency for all NFHS sports regarding what school and competitor information is permitted on the uniform which, in swimming and diving, consists of the suit and swim cap.
  • Rule 4-6-4, which requires dual confirmation for relay exchanges during championship meets. The referee and the starter may serve as the relay takeoff judges.
  • Rule 3-4, which provides competitors more flexibility when competing in 500-yard events to count either up or down with visual lap counters. This practice permits flexibility for the competitor, and is in keeping with current trends in the sport.
  • Rule 3-6 makes dealing with conduct issues easier by categorizing them within the rulebook. This is connected to 4-1-8 by providing language to make dealing with issues for officials easier

12
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

12 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Poorparent
6 years ago

Would be nice if they changed the rule on maximum size of swimsuit logos and # allowed to follow NCAA rules. UK speedo kneeskins have logos that are 2.5 inches wide vs US of less than 1.5 inches. Why u ask? Because UK prices are 40-50% cheaper for the same suit! #kickback?

James Chapman
7 years ago

The discussion we are having here is how the wording of the new relay takeoff rule is to be interpreted as it relates to the wedges.

The rules states the swimmer shall have one foot in front of the wedge on a relay takeoff. What is not defined is the term foot.

The rules also say the swimmer must have a foot (or feet in the USA book) in contact with the starting platform when the incoming swimmer finishes, but the interpretation is that if the toes are still touching the block it is a legal exchange.

Does this mean only some part (toes) must be in front of the wedge, or does it require the entire… Read more »

coacherik
7 years ago

Rule 4-6-4, which requires dual confirmation for relay exchanges during championship meets. The referee and the starter may serve as the relay takeoff judges.

Neither of these people are near lane 4 in an 8 lane pool and they’re going to be able to call a early take over in relays. Does this refer to them being the second person in this dual confirmation, not the primaries? If they are both allowed to make the call together, they are so far out of place that it would take obvious early take offs to make calls, otherwise close exchanges should always go to the athlete.

The Pollack
Reply to  coacherik
7 years ago

One of them will slide over to lane 5.

James Chapman
Reply to  coacherik
7 years ago

I don’t know where you work, but where I work HS meets we rarely have (only the state meet) have enough officials for RTO’s in the middle. HS is not USA. We generally will have a three or 4 official crew for a HS championship meet, with two start end officials and two turn end officials. The start end officials, the referee and the starter are generally on opposite sides of the pool looking across all 6, 8 or in some places 10+ lanes. We also use dual confirmation in our meets. Does this mean that some RTO violations are missed? I’m sure we do, but the dual confirmation also requires that both of us see it, meaning that if… Read more »

Dan
7 years ago

The standing backstroke start?
What happened, was it voted down?

Luke Ryan
Reply to  Dan
7 years ago

That specific proposed change was not mentioned in the article that the NFHS released recently.

That initial idea was two-fold. The first part of the rule proposal, “Standing in or on the gutter” dealt with non-backstroke starts, while the second part, “curling the toes over the lip of the gutter immediately after the starting signal is permitted” dealt with backstroke starts.

While it is ok for swimmers young and old to stand in or on the gutter currently, that part of the rule was just clarification. The notable part that we further examined was the idea that allowing swimmers to curl their toes over the edge of the pool on a backstroke start could help simulate the advantage… Read more »

James Chapman
Reply to  Luke Ryan
7 years ago

If we are going to allow swimmers to use the backstroke wedge, the rule prohibiting the toes in the gutter should be removed as well. The only argument I’ve heard supporting the wedge only, is that the wedge drops into the water and therefore the swimmer has to overcome the resistance of the water when starting from a backstroke wedge. I don’t buy it, but thankfully where I officiate HS, we have been hold the backstroke wedge will not be used.

ricky bobby
Reply to  Dan
7 years ago

I too would like to know….

gator
7 years ago

Can’t wait until they throw this silly rule book in the circular file!

SCSC Swim FAn
Reply to  gator
7 years ago

One hundred percent agree. As a USA Swimming official, the NFHS rule book is one of the most maddening publications I’ve ever read. It is more a “book of situations” rather than a rule book. The level of minutiae in the NFHS rule book is insane compared to USA Swimming. If it weren’t for my kid swimming high school, no way I would bother with officiating high school and just stick to USA Swimming.

BaldingEagle
Reply to  SCSC Swim FAn
7 years ago

In many cases, the high school swim coaches are part-timers, or at least that used to be the situation. Maybe an English or Math teacher who coaches the season for a stipend. They may not be all that familiar with swimming rules. There’s also the old-time contingent, who have been coaching forever, and change comes hard for them, including a new format for the rule book.

In many or most cases, it’s USA Swimming clubs and meets that do the heavy lifting in terms of top-level preparation of swimmers. Meaning, in many or most cases, the best HS swimmers get their main training and top-level competition in the USA setting (Katie Ledecky and Jack Conger come to mind immediately).… Read more »

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »