You are working on Staging1

SwimSwam Readers Predict D1 Men’s Nationals

With the NCAA championships starting up today it’s time to review what people’s expectations are for the meet. SwimSwam’s pick’em contest is a solid metric for the opinions of the general swim fan (despite the selection bias issues). Entries are now closed, so we can look at what everyone predicted. For the most part the picks here line up with SwimSwam’s official picks.

Texas are the favorite in the team competition with 56% of entries placing them 1st. Cal are next with 30% of votes. Other than 1st place, no lower place has a team picked to finish there by more than 50% of entrants.

No event was unanimous. Even Caeleb Dressel in the 50 and 100 free had 2 people pick against him (99.7% picked him). Behind Dressel’s freestyle events, the strongest favorites were Ian Finnerty in the 100 breast with 87% of picks, Dressel in the 100 fly with 76% (his 49th place seed may have hurt his ranking here, a lot of scrolling to find him in the list), and Joseph Schooling with 70% in the 200 fly.

The most contentious event is the first, tonight’s 800 free relay. In that event, the most picked team, NC State only had 34% of 1st place picks. Florida are next with 31% 1st place picks, followed by Texas with 21% and Indiana with 11%. There are 4 events where less than 50% picked any single athlete to win. The 400 medley relay saw 47% pick Indiana, 27% pick Cal, and 21% pick Texas. The 1650 saw 42% pick Felix Auboeck, 35% pick Anton Ipsen, and 20% pick Ahmen Mahmoud. In the 200 breast 49% picked Andrew Seliskar, 43% picked Ian Finnerty, and 3% picked either Mauro Castillo or Mark Szaranek.

There were a total of 698 entries. I will post a spreadsheet with everyone’s entries soon so you can follow along with your picks. The full summaries of everyone’s team and individual picks are below.

Team Picks

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Texas 55.9% 30.8% 5.4% 4.1% 2.5% 1.0% 0.2%
California 29.5% 48.3% 11.7% 5.6% 4.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2%
NC State 8.2% 10.2% 36.1% 32.2% 12.6% 1.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2%
Florida 3.5% 5.8% 32.0% 34.1% 21.0% 2.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2%
Indiana 2.5% 4.2% 13.9% 21.8% 49.9% 6.3% 0.7% 0.5%
Harvard 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 1.2%
Stanford 0.1% 0.1% 0.6% 0.1% 2.9% 14.3% 19.8% 19.6% 15.6% 17.1%
Michigan 0.3% 0.3% 1.9% 4.5% 48.9% 22.3% 10.4% 4.9% 1.5%
Arizona 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 0.5% 0.5%
Florida St 0.1% 0.2% 0.2%
Texas A&M 0.1% 0.5% 0.3% 0.8% 1.8% 2.1% 5.8%
Southern Cali 1.0% 17.4% 30.2% 20.1% 11.8% 5.8%
Auburn 0.3% 3.9% 11.0% 16.6% 28.7% 20.3%
Louisville 0.3% 2.4% 10.7% 20.2% 22.0% 14.6%
South Carolina 0.2% 0.8% 1.8% 2.1% 4.8%
Georgia 0.2% 0.5% 0.5% 0.7% 1.8% 2.3%
Arizona St 0.2% 0.3% 0.8% 1.3%
Alabama 0.7% 1.6% 3.5% 5.6% 14.8%
Tennessee 0.8% 0.3% 1.2% 1.1% 3.2%
Minnesota 0.2% 1.2% 1.1% 4.2%
Ohio St 0.7% 0.2% 1.0%
Missouri 0.5% 0.5% 0.2%
Notre Dame 0.2% 0.2%
UNLV 0.2%
West Virginia 0.2%
Virginia 0.7%

Individual Picks

School 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Event
NC State 33.9% 22.8% 16.5% 14.1% 800 Free Relay
Florida 31.4% 20.1% 20.1% 15.5% 800 Free Relay
Texas 20.8% 26.6% 23.5% 16.8% 800 Free Relay
Indiana 11.1% 22.2% 21.1% 24.1% 800 Free Relay
California 2.5% 8% 18% 26.3% 800 Free Relay
Michigan 0.1% 0.4% 2.1% 800 Free Relay
Harvard 0.1% 800 Free Relay
Arizona St 0.1% 0.3% 800 Free Relay
Southern Cali 0.1% 800 Free Relay
Stanford 0.1% 0.1% 800 Free Relay
Alabama 0.1% 800 Free Relay
Missouri 0.3% 800 Free Relay
Louisville 0.1% 800 Free Relay
Ohio St 0.1% 800 Free Relay
NC State 50.9% 27.6% 15.4% 5.3% 200 Free Relay
California 24.2% 32% 28.2% 12.2% 200 Free Relay
Texas 18.5% 27.9% 34.6% 15.3% 200 Free Relay
Florida St 3.4% 6.2% 9.5% 12% 200 Free Relay
Florida 2.7% 5.3% 8.3% 23% 200 Free Relay
Alabama 0.1% 0.3% 2.2% 15.6% 200 Free Relay
Harvard 0.1% 200 Free Relay
Auburn 0.3% 0.6% 4.5% 200 Free Relay
Indiana 0.1% 0.4% 1.9% 200 Free Relay
Michigan 0.1% 6.7% 200 Free Relay
Southern Cali 0.7% 3.3% 200 Free Relay
Stanford 0.3% 200 Free Relay
Auboeck, Felix Michigan 55.4% 35.5% 6.4% 1.8% 500 Free
Ipsen, Anton Oerskov NC State 4.5% 8.6% 23% 19.8% 500 Free
Haas, Francis Texas 31.2% 27.3% 4.8% 2.5% 500 Free
Minuth, Fynn South Carolina 3.6% 13.7% 29.6% 24.8% 500 Free
Shoults, Grant Stanford 3% 6.4% 21.7% 22.3% 500 Free
Mahmoud, Ahmed South Carolina 1.5% 3.7% 7.6% 11.6% 500 Free
Vargas Jacobo, Ricardo Michigan 0.6% 4.3% 5.3% 11.7% 500 Free
Novak, Brennan Harvard 0.3% 0.4% 500 Free
Grieshop, Sean California 0.1% 0.3% 0.9% 500 Free
Egan, Liam Stanford 0.1% 0.1% 0.6% 500 Free
Houck, Logan Harvard 0.1% 500 Free
Yeadon, Zachary Notre Dame 0.3% 1.6% 500 Free
Baqlah, Khader Florida 0.3% 0.9% 500 Free
Ransford, Patrick Michigan 0.3% 0.4% 500 Free
Harting, Zach Louisville 0.1% 500 Free
Neri, Parker Texas 0.1% 500 Free
Acosta, Marcelo Louisville 0.3% 500 Free
House, Grant Arizona St 0.1% 500 Free
Lawless, Ben Florida 0.1% 500 Free
Szaranek, Mark Florida 51.9% 27.6% 11% 5.8% 200 IM
Gonzalez, Hugo Auburn 31.3% 38.6% 16.6% 7.4% 200 IM
Seliskar, Andrew California 8.5% 11.9% 21.7% 23% 200 IM
DeVine, Abrahm Stanford 6.8% 14.7% 23.8% 22.7% 200 IM
Switkowski, Jan Florida 0.6% 3.1% 12.2% 18.1% 200 IM
Lanza, Vinicius Indiana 0.6% 2.5% 9.4% 12.5% 200 IM
Vazaios, Andreas NC State 0.1% 0.9% 3.1% 4% 200 IM
Reid, Christopher Alabama 0.1% 200 IM
Josa, Matthew California 0.4% 1.6% 3.7% 200 IM
Roberts, Jonathan Texas 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 200 IM
White, Evan Michigan 0.1% 0.7% 200 IM
Bentz, Joseph Georgia 0.3% 1.2% 200 IM
Thorne, Nicholas Arizona 0.1% 200 IM
Bonetti, Brock Texas A&M 0.1% 200 IM
Swanson, Charles Michigan 0.1% 200 IM
Van Overdam, Austin Texas A&M 0.1% 200 IM
Dressel, Caeleb Florida 99.7% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 50 Free
Becker, Bowen Minnesota 0.1% 3.9% 27.8% 21.9% 50 Free
Tan, Steven Harvard 0.1% 50 Free
Held, Ryan NC State 87.6% 8.9% 2.2% 50 Free
Apple, Zachary Auburn 1.9% 20.8% 20.5% 50 Free
Jackson, Tate Texas 1.8% 9.5% 14.7% 50 Free
Hoffer, Ryan California 1.6% 7.9% 7.9% 50 Free
Schooling, Joseph Texas 1.5% 11.8% 6.1% 50 Free
Ress, Justin NC State 0.7% 5.8% 13.1% 50 Free
Ringgold, Brett Texas 0.1% 2.5% 5.1% 50 Free
Powers, Paul Michigan 0.1% 0.9% 2.4% 50 Free
Khalafalla, Ali Indiana 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 50 Free
Farris, Dean Harvard 0.1% 0.6% 50 Free
Lynch, Justin California 1.6% 1.9% 50 Free
Condorelli, Santo Southern Cali 1.6% 1.6% 50 Free
Sendyk, Pawel California 0.1% 0.6% 50 Free
Howard, Robert Alabama 0.1% 0.4% 50 Free
Craig, Cameron Arizona St 0.1% 50 Free
Decoursey, Kyle Tennessee 0.1% 50 Free
Waddell, Zane Alabama 0.1% 50 Free
Indiana 46.8% 22% 17.4% 8.9% 400 Medley Relay
California 26.7% 35.3% 24.3% 10% 400 Medley Relay
Texas 20.8% 27.2% 27.2% 12.9% 400 Medley Relay
Florida 2.8% 6.7% 15.5% 31.1% 400 Medley Relay
NC State 2.2% 8.5% 14.7% 32% 400 Medley Relay
Texas A&M 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 400 Medley Relay
Southern Cali 0.1% 0.1% 0.9% 4.3% 400 Medley Relay
Harvard 0.1% 400 Medley Relay
Louisville 0.3% 400 Medley Relay
Stanford 0.1% 400 Medley Relay
Gonzalez, Hugo Auburn 54.2% 21.9% 17% 4.6% 400 IM
Seliskar, Andrew California 23% 38.1% 30.8% 6% 400 IM
Szaranek, Mark Florida 21.7% 34.2% 35.5% 6% 400 IM
Litherland, Jay Georgia 0.7% 2.4% 6.7% 30.1% 400 IM
DeVine, Abrahm Stanford 0.3% 0.7% 2.1% 6.5% 400 IM
Ogren, Curtis Stanford 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 1.5% 400 IM
Almeida, Brandonn South Carolina 1% 4.5% 19.9% 400 IM
Roberts, Jonathan Texas 0.4% 0.4% 1.6% 400 IM
Swanson, Charles Michigan 0.3% 1.5% 13.2% 400 IM
Ipsen, Anton Oerskov NC State 0.3% 0.4% 3% 400 IM
Bentz, Joseph Georgia 0.3% 0.4% 2.7% 400 IM
Stewart, Samuel Texas 0.1% 0.7% 400 IM
Schubert, Frederick Virginia 0.1% 3.6% 400 IM
Harty, Ryan Texas 0.1% 400 IM
Grieshop, Sean California 0.4% 400 IM
Thorne, Nicholas Arizona 0.1% 400 IM
Dressel, Caeleb Florida 76.3% 5.6% 0.1% 0.1% 100 Fly
Schooling, Joseph Texas 20.3% 74.3% 4.3% 0.6% 100 Fly
Lanza, Vinicius Indiana 2.5% 7.3% 19.3% 33.9% 100 Fly
Held, Ryan NC State 0.7% 11.3% 60.7% 15% 100 Fly
Tan, Steven Harvard 0.1% 100 Fly
Lynch, Justin California 0.9% 5.8% 19.5% 100 Fly
Josa, Matthew California 0.4% 3.3% 11.8% 100 Fly
Condorelli, Santo Southern Cali 0.1% 0.7% 1.9% 100 Fly
Stewart, Coleman NC State 2.8% 7.4% 100 Fly
Switkowski, Jan Florida 1.2% 5.7% 100 Fly
Quah, Zheng Wen California 0.4% 2.1% 100 Fly
Hoffer, Ryan California 0.4% 0.3% 100 Fly
Jackson, Tate Texas 0.1% 0.3% 100 Fly
Kaleoaloha, Kanoa Florida St 0.1% 0.1% 100 Fly
Saunderson, Jack Towson 0.1% 0.1% 100 Fly
Shebat, John Texas 0.1% 0.1% 100 Fly
Lense, Noah Ohio St 0.1% 100 Fly
Dobbs, Chatham Arizona 0.3% 100 Fly
Murphy, Camden Georgia 0.3% 100 Fly
Ringgold, Brett Texas 0.1% 100 Fly
Sendyk, Pawel California 0.1% 100 Fly
Haas, Francis Texas 59.2% 23.9% 8.5% 4% 200 Free
Pieroni, Blake Indiana 31.8% 47.3% 18.3% 1.9% 200 Free
Farris, Dean Harvard 7.6% 22.1% 45.5% 14.9% 200 Free
Baqlah, Khader Florida 0.6% 1.3% 8.3% 23.4% 200 Free
Craig, Cameron Arizona St 0.3% 1% 5.1% 14.9% 200 Free
Ress, Justin NC State 0.3% 1.5% 4.2% 15.5% 200 Free
Samy, Mohamed Indiana 0.1% 0.4% 0.7% 3.3% 200 Free
Shoults, Grant Stanford 0.1% 0.3% 200 Free
Carter, Dylan Southern Cali 0.9% 6.4% 10.7% 200 Free
Rooney, Maxime Florida 0.7% 1.2% 4% 200 Free
Apple, Zachary Auburn 0.3% 0.9% 2.5% 200 Free
Auboeck, Felix Michigan 0.1% 0.6% 1.2% 200 Free
House, Grant Arizona St 0.1% 0.1% 200 Free
Novak, Brennan Harvard 0.1% 200 Free
Newkirk, Jeffrey Texas 0.1% 3% 200 Free
Delakis, Paul Ohio St 0.3% 200 Free
Minuth, Fynn South Carolina 0.1% 200 Free
Finnerty, Ian Indiana 87.2% 7.5% 2.8% 1.2% 100 Breast
Hoppe, Connor California 4.6% 13.3% 17.3% 16.5% 100 Breast
McHugh, Conner Minnesota 3.3% 30.3% 24.1% 18.8% 100 Breast
Vissering, Carsten Southern Cali 2.1% 9.2% 8.3% 8.5% 100 Breast
Brock, Levi Indiana 1.3% 31.4% 26.8% 16.2% 100 Breast
Montague, Jacob Michigan 0.6% 5.8% 13.4% 23.7% 100 Breast
Evdokimov, Ilya Cornell 0.1% 0.7% 1.9% 4.9% 100 Breast
Bish, Blair Missouri St. 0.1% 0.7% 1.5% 4% 100 Breast
Castillo Luna, Mauro Texas A&M 0.1% 0.4% 2.1% 3% 100 Breast
Stevens, Peter Tennessee 0.1% 0.4% 0.9% 1.2% 100 Breast
Armstrong, Jake West Virginia 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.6% 100 Breast
Somov, Evgenii Louisville 0.1% 0.1% 100 Breast
Cono, Benjamin Loyola 0.3% 0.1% 100 Breast
Bams, Laurent Alabama 0.1% 100 Breast
Babinet, Jeremy Michigan 0.3% 100 Breast
Claverie, Carlos Louisville 0.3% 100 Breast
Barnum, Keefer Virginia 0.1% 100 Breast
Sand, Carson California 0.1% 100 Breast
Wich-Glasen, Nils South Carolina 0.1% 100 Breast
Stewart, Coleman NC State 61.1% 26.6% 8.2% 2.4% 100 Back
Shebat, John Texas 23.6% 20.7% 8% 4% 100 Back
Nikolaev, Mark Grand Canyon 5.3% 18.6% 18.9% 18.3% 100 Back
Katz, Austin Texas 3.7% 9.8% 17.4% 18.3% 100 Back
Fantoni, Gabriel Indiana 1.8% 11.2% 15.5% 13.8% 100 Back
Acevedo, Javier Georgia 1.6% 4.8% 11.5% 16.5% 100 Back
Glinta, Robert Southern Cali 0.9% 2.1% 6.7% 7.7% 100 Back
Kaliszak, Lucas Alabama 0.9% 1.5% 4.3% 4.9% 100 Back
Tribuntsov, Ralf Southern Cali 0.7% 3.6% 6.8% 8.2% 100 Back
Stuart, Hennessey NC State 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 100 Back
Carr, Daniel California 0.1% 0.3% 100 Back
Albiero, Nicolas Louisville 0.4% 0.9% 1.9% 100 Back
Vazaios, Andreas NC State 0.3% 0.6% 1.3% 100 Back
Poti, Zachary Arizona St 0.1% 1% 100 Back
Samy, Mohamed Indiana 0.1% 100 Back
Staka, Christopher Alabama 0.1% 100 Back
Ungur, Catalin Utah 0.3% 0.3% 100 Back
Waddell, Zane Alabama 0.1% 0.1% 100 Back
Artmann, Joshua Texas 0.1% 100 Back
Clark, Joseph Virginia 0.1% 100 Back
Hein, Daniel Missouri 0.1% 100 Back
Said, Youssef Georgia 0.1% 100 Back
Bonetti, Brock Texas A&M 0.1% 100 Back
Hokfelt, Gustav GWU 0.1% 100 Back
Florida 64.5% 25.4% 6.7% 2.8% 200 Medley Relay
Texas 6.4% 17.4% 18.5% 11.8% 200 Medley Relay
California 23.1% 41.2% 23.1% 8.8% 200 Medley Relay
Alabama 1% 1% 2.5% 4.3% 200 Medley Relay
NC State 1.6% 7.4% 24.7% 23.5% 200 Medley Relay
Tennessee 1.5% 4.6% 16.5% 25.7% 200 Medley Relay
Texas A&M 0.9% 0.6% 0.1% 1.2% 200 Medley Relay
Indiana 0.7% 1.5% 5.4% 11.5% 200 Medley Relay
Louisville 0.1% 0.7% 2.4% 10% 200 Medley Relay
Stanford 0.1% 200 Medley Relay
Auburn 0.1% 200 Medley Relay
Grand Canyon University 0.1% 200 Medley Relay
Southern Cali 0.1% 200 Medley Relay
Auboeck, Felix Michigan 42% 36.8% 13.9% 5.2% 1650 Free
Ipsen, Anton Oerskov NC State 35% 26.1% 29.5% 6.1% 1650 Free
Mahmoud, Ahmed South Carolina 19.6% 24% 19.5% 16.2% 1650 Free
Shoults, Grant Stanford 1.6% 4.8% 17% 30.1% 1650 Free
Yeadon, Zachary Notre Dame 0.6% 5.5% 12.2% 17% 1650 Free
Sweetser, Nicholas Stanford 0.6% 1.5% 2.8% 8.2% 1650 Free
Norman, Nicholas California 0.3% 0.3% 1.5% 4.5% 1650 Free
Ransford, Patrick Michigan 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% 2.7% 1650 Free
Houck, Logan Harvard 0.1% 1650 Free
Grieshop, Sean California 0.3% 1% 4% 1650 Free
Acosta, Marcelo Louisville 0.1% 0.3% 1.5% 1650 Free
Almeida, Brandonn South Carolina 0.1% 0.1% 1650 Free
Novak, Brennan Harvard 0.1% 0.1% 1650 Free
Bekemeyer, Matthew South Carolina 0.1% 1650 Free
Vargas Jacobo, Ricardo Michigan 0.9% 3.3% 1650 Free
Yeager, Christopher Texas 0.3% 0.1% 1650 Free
Calloni, Johannes Stanford 0.1% 1650 Free
Casey, Brendan Virginia 0.1% 1650 Free
Jones, Isaac Kentucky 0.1% 1650 Free
Lawless, Ben Florida 0.1% 1650 Free
Manganiello, Blake Florida 0.1% 1650 Free
Wielinski, Jacob Missouri 0.1% 1650 Free
Wieser, Christopher Arizona 0.1% 1650 Free
Katz, Austin Texas 60% 25.5% 8.5% 3.6% 200 Back
Gonzalez, Hugo Auburn 5.9% 19.8% 25.2% 16.5% 200 Back
Mulcare, Patrick Southern Cali 5.5% 10.7% 12.7% 13.4% 200 Back
Farris, Dean Harvard 12.5% 22.5% 23% 17.6% 200 Back
Shebat, John Texas 12.2% 7.3% 4.6% 5.8% 200 Back
Harty, Ryan Texas 1.3% 9.1% 14.6% 22.8% 200 Back
Stewart, Coleman NC State 1.2% 3% 5.7% 7.5% 200 Back
Reid, Christopher Alabama 0.6% 0.6% 1.2% 2.4% 200 Back
Carr, Daniel California 0.3% 0.1% 0.4% 200 Back
Roberts, Jonathan Texas 0.1% 0.9% 1.6% 3.4% 200 Back
Stuart, Hennessey NC State 0.1% 0.6% 1.2% 200 Back
Poti, Zachary Arizona St 0.1% 0.1% 200 Back
DeVine, Abrahm Stanford 0.3% 1% 0.7% 200 Back
Acevedo, Javier Georgia 0.1% 0.6% 0.4% 200 Back
Samy, Mohamed Indiana 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% 200 Back
Loncar, Anton Denver 0.3% 1% 200 Back
Taylor, Michael Florida 0.1% 1% 200 Back
Mefford, Bryce California 0.3% 200 Back
Artmann, Joshua Texas 0.1% 200 Back
Aydin, Metin Hawaii 0.1% 200 Back
Glinta, Robert Southern Cali 0.1% 200 Back
Mullis, William UCSB 0.1% 200 Back
Newkirk, Jeffrey Texas 0.1% 200 Back
Nikolaev, Mark Grand Canyon 0.1% 200 Back
Dressel, Caeleb Florida 99.7% 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% 100 Free
Jackson, Tate Texas 0.1% 11.5% 24% 30.8% 100 Free
Tan, Steven Harvard 0.1% 100 Free
Held, Ryan NC State 68.6% 21.7% 6.1% 100 Free
Pieroni, Blake Indiana 16.2% 40.3% 24% 100 Free
Ress, Justin NC State 0.7% 2.1% 7.3% 100 Free
Hoffer, Ryan California 0.6% 2.2% 4.3% 100 Free
Condorelli, Santo Southern Cali 0.6% 1.3% 1.2% 100 Free
Apple, Zachary Auburn 0.4% 4.9% 16.4% 100 Free
Ringgold, Brett Texas 0.4% 2.1% 4.5% 100 Free
Becker, Bowen Minnesota 0.1% 0.9% 2.8% 100 Free
Howard, Robert Alabama 0.1% 0.1% 100 Free
Jensen, Michael California 0.1% 100 Free
Holoda, Peter Auburn 0.1% 0.4% 100 Free
Lynch, Justin California 0.1% 0.3% 100 Free
Haas, Francis Texas 0.6% 100 Free
Craig, Cameron Arizona St 0.4% 100 Free
Seliskar, Andrew California 49.3% 32.6% 12.5% 3.3% 200 Breast
Finnerty, Ian Indiana 43.4% 27.3% 13.6% 8.9% 200 Breast
Castillo Luna, Mauro Texas A&M 3.4% 8% 11% 17.6% 200 Breast
Szaranek, Mark Florida 3% 20.3% 35.8% 25% 200 Breast
McHugh, Conner Minnesota 0.7% 10.6% 24.3% 33.1% 200 Breast
Armstrong, Jake West Virginia 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 200 Breast
Brock, Levi Indiana 0.6% 0.9% 3.7% 200 Breast
Evdokimov, Ilya Cornell 0.1% 0.4% 2.2% 200 Breast
Montague, Jacob Michigan 0.1% 0.1% 1.5% 200 Breast
Tybur, Jonathan Texas A&M 0.1% 0.3% 200 Breast
Claverie, Carlos Louisville 0.7% 2.2% 200 Breast
Wich-Glasen, Nils South Carolina 0.1% 0.1% 200 Breast
Amaltdinov, Marat Purdue 0.1% 200 Breast
Hoppe, Connor California 0.1% 200 Breast
Cope, Thomas Michigan 0.9% 200 Breast
Somov, Evgenii Louisville 0.7% 200 Breast
Guest, James Georgia 0.1% 200 Breast
Schooling, Joseph Texas 70.1% 20.6% 5.7% 2.5% 200 Fly
Quah, Zheng Wen California 20.4% 52.3% 14.6% 7.6% 200 Fly
Lanza, Vinicius Indiana 8.2% 19.2% 46.3% 12.1% 200 Fly
Saunderson, Jack Towson 0.4% 0.6% 200 Fly
Wright, Justin Arizona 0.1% 2.8% 10.9% 19.8% 200 Fly
Pomajevich, Samuel Texas 0.1% 2.2% 6.3% 19.8% 200 Fly
Vazaios, Andreas NC State 0.3% 0.7% 7.3% 16.1% 200 Fly
Bentz, Joseph Georgia 0.1% 0.4% 3.6% 9.8% 200 Fly
Switkowski, Jan Florida 0.1% 0.1% 1.8% 2.7% 200 Fly
Josa, Matthew California 0.4% 1.6% 2.1% 200 Fly
Thomas, Michael California 0.3% 0.4% 1.5% 200 Fly
Albiero, Nicolas Louisville 0.3% 0.3% 2.1% 200 Fly
Lense, Noah Ohio St 0.1% 0.7% 1.8% 200 Fly
Schubert, Frederick Virginia 0.1% 0.1% 200 Fly
Ferraro, Christian Georgia Tech 0.1% 200 Fly
Minuth, Fynn South Carolina 0.3% 0.1% 200 Fly
Harting, Zach Louisville 0.1% 0.7% 200 Fly
Julian, Trenton California 0.3% 200 Fly
Murphy, Camden Georgia 0.1% 200 Fly
NC State 66.2% 23.1% 8% 3.1% 400 Free Relay
Texas 19.6% 32.5% 27.4% 18.5% 400 Free Relay
Florida 10.4% 36.1% 35.3% 15.2% 400 Free Relay
California 3.6% 7.6% 26.2% 48.3% 400 Free Relay
Harvard 0.1% 400 Free Relay
Indiana 0.7% 0.9% 6.4% 400 Free Relay
Auburn 1.6% 7.2% 400 Free Relay
Southern Cali 0.3% 0.9% 400 Free Relay
Alabama 0.1% 0.3% 400 Free Relay
Florida St 0.1% 400 Free Relay

6
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

6 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
iLikePsych
6 years ago

The 0.3% picking Harvard to win the meet will be happy when everyone decides to give it to them after Dean protects the world from devastation.

Easy Speed
6 years ago

Funny that based on these predictions cal will only win 1 event

aviatorfly
6 years ago

Either that’s a picture of a female stretching on the blocks, or that’s a highly illegal race suit and that swimmer needs to be DQ’d!

Steve Nolan
6 years ago

“Farris, Dean Harvard 7.6% 22.1% 45.5% 14.9% 200 Free”

Idk if I can trust these numbers? Pretty sure all 3 of his events should say “100% 0% 0% 0%”

osd
6 years ago

Do we think the same person picked Steven Tan to win three events, or do we think three different people thought he would win one, and each of them different events?

dmswim
Reply to  osd
6 years ago

I think someone went through and picked Harvard to win every event they had someone in.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »