You are working on Staging1

IOC President Bach: IOC Will Remain Neutral on Political Boycott of Beijing ‘22

On December 6th, the Biden Administration announced a political boycott of the Beijing ‘22 Winter Olympics. Press Secretary Jen Psaki stated that the United States would not send any diplomatic or official representation to the Games because of the Chinese government’s, “ongoing genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang and other human rights abuses.”

Following the announcement, Canada, Great Britain, and Australia also announced political boycotts of the Beijing Olympics. 

Unlike the American boycott of the 1980 Olympics or the Soviet boycott of the 1984 Olympics, athletes from the boycotting nations will still compete in Beijing. 

IOC President Thomas Bach stated in an online news conference that the “presence of government officials is a purely political decision…the principle of the political neutrality of the IOC applies”. Bach also said that the Olympics are “about and for the athletes”. 

The Chinese Foreign Ministry has promised “firm countermeasures”, but Press Secretary Psaki could not identify what the Chinese government’s intentions could be with regards to these countermeasures. 

In his press conference, Bach emphasized the importance of the political neutrality of the IOC. He said that taking a side in the dispute would, “be the politicization of the Olympics Games” which “could be the end of the Olympic Games, as it was the end of the ancient Olympic Games when politics got involved.”

Historians place blame for the end of the ancient Olympics on Roman Emperor Theodosius I, whose code placed prohibitions on pagan practices and led to the downfall of the Games. 

While most sporting organizations have tried to toe a neutral line on China, the Women’s Tennis Association and International Tennis Federation have both withdrawn from the country, at least in the short term, over concerns for the treatment of star player Peng Shuai. Shuai accused the country’s former vice premier of sexual assault, which led to concern over her well-being. Two reported video calls between Peng and IOC president Thomas Bach on November 21 and December 1 are among the few public appearances Peng has made since making her accusation, which has left many concerned for her safety.

12
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

12 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ugly IS my alibi
2 years ago

Bach Bach Bach Bach Bach

Ka
2 years ago

After the peng shuai incident, every sports governing body should withdraw from China.

Verram
2 years ago

IOC does nothing for human rights when money is involved .. China pays off everyone

Old Rocket Swimmer
2 years ago

Same response in the summer of 1936…

Dee
2 years ago

Weak.

Sun Yangs Hammer
2 years ago

What does “neutral” on genocide and crimes against humanity even mean?

swammer
Reply to  Sun Yangs Hammer
2 years ago

complacent… he remains complacent

2Fat4Speed
Reply to  Sun Yangs Hammer
2 years ago

Exactly! By staying “neutral” (not even acknowledging the genocide) you are communicating that you don’t even care that it is happening. Genocide is not “political”, it is a crime against humanity.

Meeeeee
Reply to  Sun Yangs Hammer
2 years ago

They stand to make a lot of money from China is what it means

10U Dad
Reply to  Sun Yangs Hammer
2 years ago

It means we’re too busy stacking Benjamins to care about pesky things like genocide, slave labor, oppression of human rights, etc.

Breezeway
2 years ago

Shocker! 🙄

Resting Defenseless
Reply to  Breezeway
2 years ago

Yep…just when we thought the IOC could stoop no lower…horrendous.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »