You are working on Staging1

2014 W. NCAA Picks: 100 fly might come down to fingernails

There might not be a harder event in the NCAA this year to predict than the women’ 100 fly. With 2013 champ Olivia Scott out of the pool at Auburn and out of the picture at NCAAs, we will see a new winner crowned this week. But this is one of those rare events where any one of maybe 5 or 6 swimmers could win the race and it wouldn’t be considered a major surprise.

And the field is so tight coming into the meet that nothing about the top 16 seems set in stone. There’s a tie for the top seed. There’s another tie for 4th. There’s a tie for 10th. All-in-all, 13 women have already been under 52 in the event this year; compare that to just 7 at NCAAs a year ago and 7 the year before that.

The other intriguing factor are the different rest strategies among the top seeds. Three of the top 5 invites in the 100 fly put up their season-bests all the way back in November, choosing to more or less swim through their conference championships. That should bode well for their ability to drop more time at NCAAs, but the potential for rust makes it just another wild card in what should be a wild, wild race.

The top two seeds each hit 51.13s on consecutive days the week before Thanksgiving. Florida’s Ellese Zalewski and Missouri’s Dani Barbiea were among the first swimmers in the nation to put up “A” cuts, and their times still lead the NCAA. Zalewski was only about a half-second off that (51.58) at SECs, while Barbeiea seemed much less prepped for the conference championship. It won’t take much of a drop from their season-bests for either or both to put up a 50-second race in Minneapolis.

On the other end of the spectrum are Felicia Lee and Kendyl Stewart. That duo put up season-bests just a few weeks ago at Pac-12s and sit third and fourth, breathing down the lead pair’s necks. Stanford’s Lee was 51.26 to win the Pac-12 title; USC’s Stewart was second in 51.36. Both have NCAA scoring experience in the event, Lee from 2012 (12th) and Stewart from a year ago (9th).

The Pac-12 name to watch out for, though, might be Rachel Bootsma. The Cal sophomore is seeded back at 14, having only gone 52.06 this season. But Bootsma was second in this event last year, just .05 away from sitting as the defending champion right now. The 100 fly is the first half of her Friday double at NCAAs (she swims her signature 100 back three events later), but I doubt she’s planning to hold anything back in this butterfly race.

Another relatively low seed primed to move up is Louisville’s Kelsi Worrell. A returning A-finalist, Worrell had the luxury of cruising through the AAC Championships and should have plenty more to give at the national champ meet. Considering Worrell’s 2013 season-best actually would have won the NCAA title last year, she’s got to be considered a major threat for the rising Cardinal program.

Plenty more names are clearly in the hunt for championship final slots. Kentucky’s Tina Bechtel is tied for the 4-seed, and her 51.36 came back in November as well. She struggled at NCAAs last year, but the Wildcats will hope her rest lines up better this postseason. SMU freshman Marne Erasmus actually beat Worrell for the AAC title and she’s an unknown commodity, having just arrived into the NCAA this semester.

Some lesser-known conferences managed to send in some legitimate scoring threats as well. UNLV’s Katelyne Herrington is the 6-seed at 51.48 out of the Mountain West, while UCSB’s Andrea Ward sits tenth (51.76) for the Mountain Pacific Sports Federation.

Big Ten champ Mackenzie Powers is part of a Penn State crew that swam lights out at the conference level, and she’ll try to break out on the national level this week. Second at Big Tens was talented Indiana freshman Gia Dalesandro, who might be better suited for the 200 but is still a player here. 2012 conference champ Becca Weiland out of Minnesota seemed to swim through the conference championship; she was 51.61 a year ago, the fifth-fastest time in all of college swimming for the season.

More returning point scorers: Florida’s Natalie Hinds (tied for 9th in 2013, seeded 23rd), UCLA’s Ting Quah (7th in 2013, seeded 35th) and Texas A&M’s Paige Miller (14th in 2013, seeded 26th).

Confused yet?

(Just be glad you don’t have to publicly predict who out of this jam-packed stable will fill the top 8, alright?)

Top 8 Picks with Seed Times:

In a field this tough top-to-bottom, many of these predictions bank a lot on speculation about rest – an inherently risky endeavor, but a factor that will likely be big in shaping how this field actually turns out.

1. Ellese Zalewski – Florida – 51.13
2. Dani Barbiea – Missouri – 51.13
3. Kelsi Worrell – Louisville – 51.76
4. Rachel Bootsma – Cal – 52.06
5. Tina Bechtel – Kentucky – 51.36
6. Felicia Lee – Stanford – 51.26
7. Kendyl Stewart – USC – 51.36
8. Becca Weiland – Minnesota – 52.11

Darkhorse: Cindy Tran – Cal. Tran was clearly off her game at NCAAs in 2013 and has been up and down this season. But she’s still a major talent who’s done damage in this event before. Going with the senior is probably a boom-or-bust endeavor at this point, but don’t be shocked if it’s a boom.

In This Story

11
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

11 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ArtVanDeLegh10
10 years ago

I would be very surprised if Tran went 50. Yes, she has more speed than anyone in field, maybe other than her teammate Osman, but she also has the worst 2nd 50 and last 25 of any of the top 20 swimmers.

I’d go with Lee, Worrell, Zalewski over the rest of the field.

swim1
Reply to  ArtVanDeLegh10
10 years ago

I think Worrell has more speed than anyone in the field. She was shaved/tapered for conference last year and still lead the field at the 25, 50 and 75 mark at the A finals last year. This year she is shaved and tapered only for NCAA’s and still posted 51.7 at AAC’s.

Prediction – she will be only sub 51. Heck – she might go 49.

John Sampson
10 years ago

Tran was 51.62 her (freshman or sophomore year; it slips of my head which year) to win the B final-so the talent is definitely there. I would not be surprised if she did come in and rip off 50. in both, I think last year was just off for her during NCAAs cause she had a great mid season. I also wonder how much faster her 50 fly can get or perhaps they will put Osman on the fly leg of the 200 medley.

Floppy
10 years ago

What’s the deal with 2013 champ Olivia Scott? Is her career over? Is she just taking time away to reassess?

Light crichton
Reply to  Floppy
10 years ago

Patience and time do more than strength or passion.

Dark twain
Reply to  Light crichton
10 years ago

Lost time is never found again.

Party mcfly
Reply to  Dark twain
10 years ago

That is heavy.

Sean S
10 years ago

Would Morgan mind throwing his top three out their as well?

Spencer Hammaker
10 years ago

Bootsma, osman, batchelor, and Tran will score in this race. I think Tran could really be the winner here though. 22.6 on the medley relay is fast. She is ready to do the senior 50. Breakthrough. Just like vollmer, sims, and isakovic. Except tran has infinitely better under waters than those three titlists from Berkeley. It should be a good show.

liquidassets
Reply to  Spencer Hammaker
10 years ago

Going in to Cal freshman fall, Tran said her goal was to be the first woman to go under 50.0 for both the 100 fly and back. She doesn’t seem exactly on track to do that, but her recent improvement is encouraging after an erratic year or two.

Hulk Swim
10 years ago

This is an event where Cal can get an edge on Georgia… who really need Harrington to score. I think Bootsma *can* win this, and if she does and Georgia gets no points it could swing momentum.

About Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson swam for nearly twenty years. Then, Jared Anderson stopped swimming and started writing about swimming. He's not sick of swimming yet. Swimming might be sick of him, though. Jared was a YMCA and high school swimmer in northern Minnesota, and spent his college years swimming breaststroke and occasionally pretending …

Read More »