You are working on Staging1

Congress Proposes Blocking Of Olympic ‘Victory Tax’

What is the bill?

The Senate passed legislation just before the beginning of the 2016 Summer Olympics to make any winnings tax free. The House has recently approved a similar bill to block the victory tax which will now go back to the Senate.

The US Olympic Committee (USOC) awards cash prizes to medalists at the Olympics. $25,000 is awarded for Gold, $15,000 is awarded for silver, and $10,000 is awarded for Bronze. The IRS considers this prize money to be a taxable income, and requires athletes to pay a significant tax on their medals. Currently, the IRS can tax up to a maximum of 39.6% on cash bonuses from medals. This adds up to about $9,900 per Gold, $5,940 per Silver and $3,960 per Bronze.

The House bill seeks to block the victory tax which is currently imposed on both Olympic and Paralympic athletes. Senator Chuck Schumer, a sponsor of the bill stated “Our Olympian and Paralympic athletes should be worried about breaking world records, not breaking the bank, when they earn a medal,” according to USA Today (See full article here).

Two Sides to the Story

Though the victory tax is high, it is important to remember that athletes are still United States citizens and as such have to pay US taxes. A cash bonus is added income, and income in the US is taxed. It’s not just Olympians whose bonuses are taxed. Every Nobel Prize winner, lottery winner and even those who receive a yearly cash bonus from their employers must pay a tax on their added earnings.

On the other hand, most Olympians don’t make as much money as coaches and administrators of the sports that they compete in. The sponsors of the bill want to combat this, and help the athletes to make more money. Not every athlete signs an endorsement that pays them to compete. Athletes that make a significant, livable income from their sport are hard to come by, and those that don’t make an income from it want to keep what they earn.

Will it pass?

This bill is thought likely to pass. The amount of money lost from national coffers will be very small. Since the Olympics happen only every four years, this tax is only imposed every four years. It will also most likely be a popular move among voters, which gives it an extra boost to pass in Congress.

16
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

16 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dawgpaddle
8 years ago

I say tax those free loading swimmers!!! Why should they be exempt. Why should Ryan Lochte not pay taxes on his swimming bootie???

Joel Lin
8 years ago

The Bling Bill

Porsche
8 years ago

I’ll believe it when I see it. Our government is way to money hungry to do something so generous for our Olympians.

CROOKED HILLARY
Reply to  Porsche
8 years ago

And $20 trillion in debt.

Sir Swimsalot
8 years ago

Finally!

DLswim
8 years ago

As you point out, most Olympians don’t make very much money, so they probably pay an effective tax rate that is much lower than the 39.6% that you quoted. This does not apply to people like Phelps or Lochte, the former because he makes millions of $$ / year, the latter because he had to forfeit his winnings.

Uberfan
8 years ago

Imagine if the bill had always been around Michael phelps would have made 640k in medals alone

mcmflyguy
Reply to  Uberfan
8 years ago

he’s already been taxed 250,000 from all his olympic medals. just for reference.

CROOKED HILLARY
Reply to  mcmflyguy
8 years ago

250k is a jet ride on air force one on it’s way to Hawaii. It takes a lot to support the greed of the ruling class.

G.I.N.A
Reply to  CROOKED HILLARY
8 years ago

MP will have to repeat a 12 year winningest stint to pay for the return journey . Can’t leave him there in Hawaii this Christmas or can you?

Coach mary
Reply to  CROOKED HILLARY
8 years ago

How inappropriate. Our elected officials dont have out of sight salaries. Many of them would have been very successful in the business world. Anyway this discussion is about our athletes!

bossanova
Reply to  CROOKED HILLARY
8 years ago

Very true. Trump flies back to NYC on the taxpayer dime because he’s too much of a germophobe to stay at a hotel.

G.I.N.A
Reply to  bossanova
8 years ago

He is under FEC rules for the campaign . No one has suggested his use of his plane is a burden on US taxpayers . He can go where he likes – no? If it is home every night then good for him .After all he does have an 11 year old son & a hot wife .

bossanova
Reply to  G.I.N.A
8 years ago

But his use of his plane IS a burden on taxpayers. He gets secret service protection. The Secret Service, like most Federal employees, doesn’t accept gifts. That means they have to pay for their travel and accommodations. The campaign books and pays for it and the Federal government reimburses the campaign. The thing here is that the Trump Campaign is only using Trump owned companies so Trump is personally benefiting from it.

G.I.N.A
Reply to  bossanova
8 years ago

So you admit that the SS have accommodation costs but that would be wherever he stayed .It could be much more because they have to screen out every hotel . President Obama also will fly to Ca for 2 fundraisers & 1 meeting & fly back often for this reason . ( Crooked Hillary might have been better noting Michelle often takes separate flights rather than the Holiday itself).

It is known DT arranges his rallies often 2 a day in a specific order to be able to fly in to NY .If the SS were smart they would source their guard from NY also thus allowing them to go home too. Airlines get their staff home wherever possible each… Read more »

Martin
Reply to  Uberfan
8 years ago

Imagine MP would compete for Singapore (Singapore awards 750k for a gold medal).

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »