2023 NCAA DIVISION I MEN’S SWIMMING & DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS
- March 22-25, 2023
- Jean K. Freeman Aquatic Center | Minneapolis, MN
- SCY (25 yards)
- Meet Central
- Psych Sheets
- SwimSwam Preview Index
- SwimSwam Pick ’em Contest
- Live Results
The 2023 Men’s Division I NCAA Championships are just under 24 hours from kicking off in Minneapolis, so let’s take a look at how the meet would turn out if everything happened exactly the way it’s projected to on paper, according to the official pre-scratch psych sheets.
It’s important to keep in mind that the psych sheet does not include diving points.
Division I Men’s NCAA Championship Scored Psych Sheet: Top 20 Teams
Cal is expected to repeat as the NCAA champions, racking up a projected point total of 453.5. Arizona State is hot on their heels though, seeded just 27 points behind the defending champions–a testament to both how fast they swam in-season and their performance en route to their first ever PAC-12 title. Bob Bowman reiterated post-conference that NCAAs is their focus this year, so it will be interesting to see if they can hold or improve on their seeds after already dropping so many fast times.
The visualization highlights something we’ve known about Cal for a long time: they get better as the meet goes on, and they’re ridiculously strong on day 4. The Golden Bears are expected to briefly take the lead after the 200 IM, but hand it back to Florida after the 50 free. In fact, for the majority of the meet it’s Florida and ASU that are expected to trade the lead until Cal takes over convincingly on day 4.
Of course, you have to show up and swim well to earn the points–that’s why the trophies aren’t handed out when the psych sheets drop. One team that the psych sheet undervalues is Texas, who after finishing in the top two the last eight seasons are running in seventh. We talked about this when the psych sheet first dropped: essentially, no matter how much stock you put into Texas’ seeding, they’re going to have to outperform their seeds to climb back to their usual spot in the standings.
It won’t just be Texas looking to climb up the standings, though. There’s a close race going on between six teams for a spot in the top 5, and even if first place gets locked up before the end of the meet there will still be tight battles going on for the rest of the team trophies.
Now, let’s take a closer look at the fight for top five.
Division I Men’s NCAA Championship Scored Psych Sheet: Top 7 Teams
Looking closer at the top seven teams shows how fluid the race for the title is expected to be. Florida and ASU are projected to be constantly trading the lead, making those depth swimmers and ‘B’ final races as important as ever. Additionally, they (and the rest of these teams) will be looking to outperform their seeds, something Cal has historically done very well.
This zoomed in perspective also shows that NC State is expected to be a solid fourth place. They’re expected to maintain that spot through the 500 free through the end of the meet. Points-wise, they’re on a bit of an island, over a 100 projected points behind #3 Florida but up on #5 Tennessee by nearly the same amount. In reality, we’d be quite surprised if there was this much of a gap in the middle of the standings.
Though the Tennessee women performed well at NCAAs and showed that there was a focus on NCAAs over SECs, we aren’t really expecting the Volunteers to get involved in the top 5 battle. Indiana is going to get a lot of diving points, which aren’t factored into this graph and Texas will likely outperform their seeds as well.
2023 Men’s NCAAs – PROJECTED TEAM STANDINGS
Data compiled by Andrew Mering
School | Total Psych | Individual | Relay |
California, University of, Berkeley | 454 | 299.5 | 154 |
Arizona State University | 427 | 254.5 | 172 |
Florida, University of | 420 | 243.5 | 176 |
North Carolina State University | 308 | 154 | 154 |
University of Tennessee | 218 | 89.5 | 128 |
Indiana University | 193 | 95 | 98 |
Texas, University of | 170 | 114.5 | 55 |
VA Tech | 144 | 85.5 | 58 |
Auburn University | 134 | 45.5 | 88 |
Georgia, University of | 128 | 80 | 48 |
Louisville, University of | 126 | 45.5 | 80 |
Stanford University | 122 | 39.5 | 82 |
Virginia, University of | 97 | 26 | 71 |
Texas A&M University | 92 | 66 | 26 |
Michigan, University of | 86 | 46 | 40 |
Missouri, University of | 74 | 36.5 | 37 |
Ohio State University | 68 | 34.5 | 33 |
University of Alabama | 51 | 29 | 22 |
University of Minnesota | 33 | 33 | 0 |
Wisconsin, University of, Madison | 26 | 25.5 | 0 |
Kentucky, University of | 24 | 24 | 0 |
Arizona, University of | 24 | 0 | 24 |
Georgia Institute of Technology | 20 | 19.5 | 0 |
Yale University | 16 | 16 | 0 |
Notre Dame, University of | 15 | 15 | 0 |
US Air Force Academy (M) | 15 | 15 | 0 |
Southern Illinois Univ atCarbondale (M) | 13 | 12.5 | 0 |
Princeton University | 12 | 12 | 0 |
Towson University | 12 | 12 | 0 |
Harvard University | 11 | 7 | 4 |
Utah, University of | 11 | 11 | 0 |
Pittsburgh, University of | 10 | 10 | 0 |
Louisiana State University | 10 | 10 | 0 |
Northwestern University | 5 | 5 | 0 |
South Carolina, University of, Columbia | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Southern Methodist University | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Florida State University | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2023 Men’s NCAAs – PROJECTED TEAM SCORES AFTER EACH EVENT
Data compiled by Andrew Mering
200 Medley Relay | 800 Freestyle Relay | 500 Free | 200 IM | 50 Free | 200 Freestyle Relay | 400 IM | 100 Fly | 200 Free | 100 Breast | 100 Back | 400 Medley Relay | 1650 Free | 200 Back | 100 Free | 200 Breast | 200 Fly | 400 Freestyle Relay | |
California, University of, Berkeley | 28 | 58 | 96 | 129 | 140 | 168 | 199 | 199 | 202 | 221 | 243 | 271 | 271 | 324 | 357 | 382 | 414 | 454 |
Arizona State University | 34 | 74 | 90 | 119 | 131 | 163 | 202 | 207 | 245 | 245 | 270 | 302 | 314 | 337 | 350 | 370 | 393 | 427 |
Florida, University of | 32 | 66 | 104 | 104 | 143 | 183 | 194 | 210 | 214 | 251 | 271 | 311 | 333 | 333 | 359 | 384 | 390 | 420 |
North Carolina State University | 30 | 58 | 67 | 90 | 96 | 130 | 130 | 168 | 180 | 180 | 197 | 231 | 252 | 256 | 257 | 257 | 280 | 308 |
University of Tennessee | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 75 | 105 | 108 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 151 | 151 | 151 | 180 | 185 | 186 | 218 |
Indiana University | 8 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 38 | 48 | 48 | 61 | 68 | 77 | 92 | 122 | 122 | 122 | 133 | 139 | 169 | 193 |
Texas, University of | 6 | 38 | 51 | 66 | 66 | 66 | 94 | 94 | 105 | 112 | 112 | 118 | 140 | 154 | 154 | 159 | 159 | 170 |
VA Tech | 0 | 8 | 8 | 19 | 32 | 46 | 46 | 66 | 66 | 70 | 70 | 80 | 80 | 89 | 104 | 118 | 118 | 144 |
Auburn University | 26 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 47 | 69 | 69 | 69 | 69 | 82 | 98 | 120 | 127 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 | 134 |
Georgia, University of | 24 | 34 | 51 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 58 | 58 | 60 | 60 | 69 | 69 | 84 | 112 | 112 | 112 | 114 | 128 |
Louisville, University of | 4 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 41 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 71 | 81 | 81 | 93 | 93 | 93 | 93 | 108 | 108 | 126 |
Stanford University | 0 | 24 | 24 | 39 | 40 | 52 | 52 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 96 | 96 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 122 |
Virginia, University of | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 62 | 63 | 77 | 77 | 77 | 83 | 86 | 86 | 97 |
Texas A&M University | 12 | 18 | 18 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 57 | 57 | 57 | 57 | 57 | 65 | 65 | 73 | 73 | 92 | 92 | 92 |
Michigan, University of | 14 | 26 | 26 | 32 | 35 | 37 | 39 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 60 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 78 | 86 |
Missouri, University of | 10 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 19 | 19 | 22 | 39 | 40 | 40 | 58 | 58 | 63 | 63 | 63 | 74 | 74 |
Ohio State University | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 27 | 27 | 30 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 41 | 50 | 50 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 68 |
University of Alabama | 2 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 51 |
University of Minnesota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 33 | 33 | 33 |
Wisconsin, University of, Madison | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
Kentucky, University of | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 24 | 24 |
Arizona, University of | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 24 |
Georgia Institute of Technology | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Yale University | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
Notre Dame, University of | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
US Air Force Academy (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
Southern Illinois Univ atCarbondale (M) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Princeton University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 12 |
Towson University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Harvard University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
Utah, University of | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
Pittsburgh, University of | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Louisiana State University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Northwestern University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
South Carolina, University of, Columbia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Southern Methodist University | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Florida State University | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
After Day 3 you will have 5 teams separated by about 35-40 points.
Cal pulls away Saturday.
Point totals for the 800 free relay look off.
I didn’t keep looking past that so might want to check your work.
Looks like they are cumulative team points through each event rather than point totals in the event itself. Agree the “PROJECTED TEAM SCORES BY EVENT” title is a little confusing, but the data for 800 FR looks reasonable.
While not likely in either case, Texas is more likely to score 51 points in the 500 than only have 51 points after the 500.
I don’t remember what year it was, maybe 2007, but Lochte and Florida had a killer SEC’s where they allegedly “were not tapered.” But then they performed about the same at NCAA. I won’t be surprised if this is what happens with ASU. Still a great team and a great season for them.
So early returns suggest I was wrong about wrong about ASU. Awesome relays by them.
How does Cal always go so ham on the last day?
their 200s of strokes are absolutely loaded because of a multitude of factors
What did the NCAA say when you informed them of these multiple violations?
They’ve discovered the magical “certificate in entrepreneurship” which allows dudes to swim for them for a year whilst mysteriously not attending class
lol and all of these infractions skew towards 200s?
What’s the highest amount of lead changes we’ve seen in one NCAA meet? This could be a very exciting meet if Florida and ASU NAIL their tapers or Cal falters
Speaking of tapers: one word: Eddie and all that implies!
Cal 1st 473
Florida 2nd 397
Texas 3rd 391
ASU 4th 356
NC State 5th 319
Indiana 6th 307
Tenn 7th 288
Why is the second chart top 7 and not top 8? Top 8 teams get a trophy why knock out 8th place on the second visual chart?
We could do anything we wanted for any reason, but the reality is that there’s a pretty clear gap between the top 7 and the rest of the field, on paper, so that’s where we focused.
You can see the 8th team, Virginia Tech, in the top chart.
Diving for Texas, Indiana and Tennessee could move that group up 50-120 points each.
It should’ve been easy to add in diving to this data
Add diving.
Leave diving out of all of this swimming visualization/speculation…signed Longhorn Divers.