You are working on Staging1

Early Olympic Relay Look: Mixed 4×100 Medley Relay

As the dust settles on U.S., Australian, Canadian, and French Olympic Trials, we’re taking a bird’s-eye view of how the relay battles are shaping up.

Olympic-Qualified Relays

The top 12 relays at 2019 World Championships earned Olympic berths for their nations. Four more nations earned berths by putting up the fastest times among unqualified nations over a 15-month period leading up to the Olympics.

Nation
1 2019 Worlds USA
2 2019 Worlds Australia
3 2019 Worlds Russia
4 2019 Worlds Great Britain
5 2019 Worlds Canada
6 2019 Worlds Italy
7 2019 Worlds Netherlands
8 2019 Worlds Germany
9 2019 Worlds Belarus
10 2019 Worlds Israel
11 2019 Worlds Poland
12 2019 Worlds Hungary
13 Wild Card China
14 Wild Card Japan
15 Wild Card Greece
16 Wild Card Brazil

Aggregate times below are based on season-bests from September 2020 through June 2021. Lifetime-bests or time drops can obviously change the picture significantly. We’ll do a more in-depth preview of each relay event in the coming weeks, but this first-look projection is aimed at specifically seeing the impacts of recent Olympic Trials meets on the Olympic relay picture.

The Setting / The Doubles

As this is a brand-new event to the Olympic lineup, it’s probably a good idea to check in on what other events will share a session with finals of this new addition.

Saturday, July 31 – Morning Finals Session

  • Men’s 100 fly final
  • Women’s 200 back final
  • Women’s 800 free final
  • Men’s 50 free semifinals
  • Women’s 50 free semifinals
  • Mixed Medley Relay final

In particular, that 100 fly and those 50 frees will probably cause doubles for some top athletes, with some 200 backstrokers perhaps affected too.

The Strategy

Obviously, this relay has a lot more variables than any of the six we’ve already covered. Below, we’ll drop in two different lineups for each team. To keep things consistent, the first lineup calculates the time differences between the top man and top woman in each stroke, then puts men on the two strokes with the biggest difference. The second lineup will be the exact inverse, if only to show the other options at each stroke.

Note: the two lineup listed are not the best two options for each team – they are meant to show the top male and female options in each stroke.

We’ll puzzle out each team’s best strategy a little more fully in writing, and even more so when we kick off our Olympic event previews series this month.

The Favorites

USA USA
Swimmer Split Swimmer Split
Regan Smith 57.92 Ryan Murphy 52.22
Michael Andrew 58.14 Lilly King 1:04.72
Torri Huske 55.66 Caeleb Dressel 49.76
Caeleb Dressel 47.23 Abbey Weitzeil 53.52
TOTAL: 3:38.95 TOTAL: 3:40.22

The United States coaches will have the luxury of choosing between two world-record-holding backstrokers: Murphy holds the men’s world record and Smith still holds the 200 world record, even if her 100 back world record was clipped by a tenth this summer.

Team USA has typically used King, the best women’s breaststroker on the planet, to cover a weakness in men’s breaststroke – but if Andrew matches his U.S. Trials performance, that’s no longer such a glaring weakness for the U.S. Dressel should swim either fly or free. There’s a sneaky theory that says the U.S. should try Andrew on fly, allowing King to swim breast and Dressel to anchor. That would be very unorthodox, but is an outside-the-box option. We explored a bunch of options earlier this week.

It’s worth noting that Dressel will swim three events in this session: the 100 fly final, 50 free semifinal, and then this relay. Andrew will potentially swim the 50 free semi before this relay. Weitzeil will probably also swim the 50 free semifinal.

Australia Australia
Swimmer Split Swimmer Split
Kaylee McKeown 57.45 Mitch Larkin 52.75
Zac Stubblety-Cook 59.69 Chelsea Hodges 1:05.99
Matthew Temple 50.45 Emma McKeon 55.93
Emma McKeon 52.19 Kyle Chalmers 47.59
TOTAL: 3:39.78 TOTAL: 3:42.26

Australia has a really deep group of eight here – there’s not much split between their two lineups. They’re also the defending world champs after Cate Campbell ran down the U.S. with a 51.1 split in 2019. (Campbell is another option on free, though she’ll likely have 50 free semifinals that session, too).

The one problem is that Australia’s weakest leg for both men and women is breaststroke. That means at least one of their star back/fly/free swimmers will have to watch from the bench.

Temple might have a 100 fly final in this session. McKeown will also likely have a 200 back final in this session, perhaps helping Larkin’s chances to make this relay.

Great Britain Great Britain
Swimmer Split Swimmer Split
Kathleen Dawson 58.08 Luke Greenbank 53.34
Adam Peaty 57.39 Molly Renshaw 1:06.21
James Guy 50.96 Harriet Jones 57.79
Freya Anderson 53.40 Duncan Scott 47.87
TOTAL: 3:39.83 TOTAL: 3:45.21

Great Britain won this event when it first appeared at the long course World Championships in 2015. Peaty should be a lock on this lineup. So many top nations have standout female backstrokers, and that might help the Brits, if they can swim Dawson on back without getting Peaty stuck in the chop for his important split. That’s basically what happened at Euros, when Great Britain set a European record in 3:38.82.

China China
Swimmer Split Swimmer Split
Xu Jiayu 52.37 Fu Yuanhui 59.58
Yan Zibei 58.73 Tang Qianting 1:06.40
Zhang Yufei 55.62 Sun Jiajun 51.97
Yang Junxuan 53.21 Yu Hexin 48.44
TOTAL: 3:39.93 TOTAL: 3:46.39

This relay kind of lines up perfectly for China. Their men’s medley relay has a stacked front half, but question marks on fly and free. But the women’s roster is led by dominant fly/free swimmer Zhang, with good freestyle depth. China might be a sneaky pick to snag gold here despite really not putting much emphasis on the mixed-gender relays at previous World Championships.

(China’s highest long course Worlds finish in any mixed-gender relay is a 2017 bronze. they swam alternates and took a DQ in this race a 2019 Worlds).

Another break in China’s favor: they shouldn’t have a lot of doubles in that session, especially if they use Xu and Yan on the front end.

The Contenders

Russia Russia
Swimmer Split Swimmer Split
Kliment Kolesnikov 52.09 Maria Kameneva 59.10
Evgenia Chikunova 1:06.06 Anton Chupkov 58.83
Andrei Minakov 51.17 Arina Surkova 57.54
Maria Kameneva 53.56 Kliment Kolesnikov 47.31
TOTAL: 3:42.88 TOTAL: 3:42.78

Russia has a ton of depth here too – they’ve actually got an interesting case where picking the swimmers by the biggest deficit produces a slower time than the alternate option. They could also use Evgeny Rylov on back and Kolesnikov on free. Minakov will probably have the 100 fly final in the same session, for what that’s worth.

Canada Canada
Swimmer Split Swimmer Split
Kylie Masse 57.70 Markus Thormeyer 53.40
Gabe Mastromatteo 1:00.11 Kelsey Wog 1:06.77
Maggie MacNeil 56.14 Joshua Liendo 51.40
Joshua Liendo 48.13 Penny Oleksiak 52.89
TOTAL: 3:42.08 TOTAL: 3:44.46

Canada and Russia kind of have the opposite problem – Russia’s strength is their men’s roster, while Canada’s dominant women’s roster has to cover for the men’s side in this relay. Masse is another one who could benefit if multiple nations choose to use female backstrokers. But if everyone goes with the traditional man-man-woman-woman lineup, MacNeil and Oleksiak could make up a dangerous back half – and a fun one to watch chew up the field.

Italy Italy
Swimmer Split Swimmer Split
Margherita Panziera 59.01 Thomas Ceccon 52.84
Nicolo Martingenghi 58.37 Martina Carraro 1:05.86
Federico Burdisso 51.39 Elena di Liddo 57.85
Federica Pellegrini 53.86 Alessandro Miressi 47.45
TOTAL: 3:42.63 TOTAL: 3:44.00

Italy is very strong in breaststroke on both sides, and it’s too bad only one of their multiple options can swim the final. Ceccon is a rising young swimmer, and if he has a good meet, he could help this relay a lot on the backstroke leg.

The Field

Netherlands Netherlands
Swimmer Split Swimmer Split
Kira Toussaint 58.65 Stanislas Huille 54.52
Arno Kamminga 57.90 Tess Schouten 66.92
Nyls Korstanje 51.65 Maalke de Waard 58.10
Femke Heemskerk 53.05 Stan Pijnenburg 48.55
TOTAL: 3:41.25 TOTAL: 3:48.09

The Dutch probably don’t have a lot of alternate lineup options. But this relay does allow them to use their standout men’s breaststroke leg in Kamminga, plus their top-notch women’s backstroker and freestyler(s). (One of Heemskerk or Ranomi Kromowidjojo should swim here, although Kromowidjojo will probably have 50 free semifinals in the same session.)

Japan Japan
Swimmer Split Swimmer Split
Natsumi Sakai 59.54 Ryosuke Irie 53.00
Shoma Sato 59.18 Kanako Watanabe 66.51
Takeshi Kawamoto 51.00 Suzuka Hasegawa 57.70
Rikako Ikee 53.98 Katsumi Nakamura 48.23
TOTAL: 3:43.70 TOTAL: 3:45.44

Host nation Japan could really go after this relay if superstar Rikako Ikee is back to being one of the better fly/free swimmers in the field. Japan has typically been very good in breaststroke, so both their men’s and women’s breaststroke legs could conceivably take a big step forward. Ikee could also swim fly on the women’s side, where she’s been 57.7 this year.

Germany
Swimmer Split
Laura Riedemann 59.85
Fabian Schwingenschlogl 58.95
Eric Friese 52.45
Annika Bruhn 53.93
TOTAL: 3:45.18

Germany made the 2019 Worlds final. They won’t have a lot of options here, with the top male backstroker (Marek Ulrich at 53.75) and top female flyer (Angelina Koehler at 58.64) not making the announced Olympic roster. That means Riedemann and Friese are probably locked in, and Germany gets to choose between Schwingenschlogl and Anna Elendt (1:07.17) in breaststroke and Bruhn and Damian Wierling (48.48) in free.

Belarus
Swimmer Split
Viktar Staselovich 54.50
Ilya Shymanovich 58.46
Anastasiya Kuliashova 59.59
Anastasiya Shkurdai 54.98
TOTAL: 3:47.53

Belarus swam in the Euros final last month. Their relay is built around star breaststroker Shymanovich, and the other pieces will move around based on Shkurdai, who is a star freestyler and butterflyer (57.92 this season). They went with the above lineup at Euros, but when they booked this Olympic berth at 2019 Worlds, they used Shkurdai on fly and Aksana Dziamidava (55.76) on free.

In This Story

67
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

67 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
German swimmer
3 years ago

the actual fastest german backstroker this season did make the team – Ole Braunschweig swam a 53,6 in December and also raced a first-100-over-200-back at the qualifying event in 53,74, landing on the FINA-A and solidifying his qualified status

gllr0302
3 years ago

For Canada I thought there was no WAY you would leave Liendo off this relay….until I saw the schedule. He should have an outside chance at two individual swims that night.

NJones
Reply to  gllr0302
3 years ago

The challenge for Canada is that their back half for women is so strong, as fast a 200 split as any of the teams, that it makes it difficult not to stick with MMFF even if they have to get thru a weaker by comparison front 200.

Bobo Gigi
3 years ago

Shameful to see that event at olympic games.
Same remark in athletics.
I understand USA is happy. It means 2 more gold medals for them in the medal count but come on, it’s pathetic.

NJones
Reply to  Bobo Gigi
3 years ago

You might think initially. But ironically if a could other countries have the right 2 men and 2 women able to split the 4 different strokes, not quite the advantage it looks like. They only ‘need’ one make back and breast and then 2 female anchors for example. Brits and China have that for sure…

manoj
3 years ago

What about schedule . MA is unpredictable swimmer of world . we don not have to surprise even he go 57 High ot 59 low .. But if we predicted 57 High for Ma, we can predict Murphy for 52.1 . Regan also unpredictable Either see go 57 mid or 58 mid . line Up depend on murphy position . In case of Manuel no body can expect 51 high spilt from her . but iShe have time to prepare six week after trail . If she got form and able to 52 mid in Training camp she is suitable for final spot .

Mark
3 years ago

This race is a shoo in for Team GB. We win it and do so in style.

CMOK
3 years ago

One thing somewhat overlooked is that MMFF has been the go for (I believe) every team bar one swimming the past 3 World Champ finals for a reason.

Firstly because it usually minimises the discrepancy between M and F times, but ALSO to prevent a female smimming into the wash of the male from the get-go (and thus the time disadvantage of back and breaststroke gets even bigger).

As dominant as King is, the US would be mad to use her.

It would be a very, very big gamble for any team to not go MMFF, regardless of how dominant a swimmer is in their individual.

My back of envelope (recent bests, no fly start) makes this:

US: 3.40.0

AUS:… Read more »

boknows34
Reply to  CMOK
3 years ago

GB won gold at the Euros in a new ER going FMMF, as did the Dutch in 2nd. Italy finished 3rd with FMFM. I think you have to swim to your strengths. China’s strength is MMFF which fits perfectly for this event.

CMOK
Reply to  boknows34
3 years ago

Sure, but that was a Mickey Mouse/experimental event at the Euro to be fair.

it’s a different story when the rest of the world turns up and an Olympic gold is on the line (though still probs the lower priority of the 7 relays for most)

Mark
Reply to  CMOK
3 years ago

3.43 for GB!!?? Are you going a bit loopy??

commonwombat
3 years ago

How do I see this one ? Quite simply, a lottery ! If pushed for a preference, I’ll tip in favour of USA. Whilst not completely immune to the resource husbanding issues of other nations, they are better served re range of options/resting peak talent. It can be argued they didn’t get the line-ups right in 2018 & 2019 but sooner or later, they will.

GBR may be thereabouts but do they have two “killer” female legs ? Dawson isn’t giving away too much to other top backstrokers but whilst I rate Anderson highly, as yet she’s no C1 in relay terms.

CHN = extremely dangerous IF their peak talent fires

AUS are reigning World champs but this one will… Read more »

Personal Best
Reply to  commonwombat
3 years ago

I see McKeon’s schedule as being a potential problem. Cate has fewer events so you could make the argument that she could swim the Mixed Medley – but McKeon would have had so many events by that stage, and more to come.

If the Aussies don’t think they’re contenders for gold, then I can see them potentially going with Throssell and Wilson on fly/free – or Seebohm on back, Cook on breast, Temple on fly, and Madison Wilson on free.

Last edited 3 years ago by Personal Best
Troyy
Reply to  Personal Best
3 years ago

To win gold I think one of C1’s amazing anchors is needed to offset the breast weakness but that might be too much to expect from C1 with 50 free immediately before.

CY~
3 years ago

Probably should point out that China swam the WR when they qualified for this event

About Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson swam for nearly twenty years. Then, Jared Anderson stopped swimming and started writing about swimming. He's not sick of swimming yet. Swimming might be sick of him, though. Jared was a YMCA and high school swimmer in northern Minnesota, and spent his college years swimming breaststroke and occasionally pretending …

Read More »