You are working on Staging1

The Hard Facts About Wicked-Fast Aussie Women

2016 HANCOCK PROSPECTING AUSTRALIAN CHAMPIONSHIPS (AUSTRALIAN OLYMPIC TRIALS)

When 3 women from one nation dip under the 53-second threshold in a 100m freestyle final, it’s easy to get caught up in superlatives. However, the fact remains that, through incredibly fast semi-final and final results at the 2016 Australian National Championships, the women of Australia are a clear and present danger to inflicting major pain not only on the 4x100m freestyle World Record, but also to the individual 100m freestyle podium in Rio.

This has a direct impact on potential American outcomes in Rio, as the stars n’ stripes’ women’s sprinting contingency has been in a stagnant state for some time. This was especially brought home by way of the top 3 Aussie women all clocking times under the 100m freestyle American Record and they did so in both semi-finals and finals in Adelaide.

American Record – 53.02, Amanda Weir (2009)

Aussie 100m freestyle prelim::

  1. Cate Campbell – 52.41
  2. Bronte Campbell – 52.78
  3. Emma McKeon – 52.98

Aussie 100m freestyle final:

  1. Cate Campbell – 52.38
  2. Bronte Campbell – 52.58
  3. Emma McKeon – 52.80

 

That means during a period of less than 24 hours, Australia had 6 performances that went sub-53 and, therefore, destroyed the American Record that was set way back in 2009 during the supersuit days.

No American woman has dipped beneath the 53-second threshold, with Simone Manuel having come the closest with her 53.25 mark at the 2014 Pan Pacific Games. Missy Franklin‘s time of 53.39 is the other semi-recent mark that fell on the quicker side of 53.50, but still a full second off of Cate Campbell’s speedy result that won her gold today.

At the 2012 Olympic Trials, the United States fielded just one swimmer under the 54-second mark in the form of Jessica Hardy (53.96). That was the case for Australia, too, where newly-minted retiree Melanie Wright clocked 53.85 to become the Dolphins’ top qualifier for London.

The difference is that the Aussie women as a whole have seen their times trend downward in fast fashion, while the American women are still trying to overcome the 53-second hurdle. The American women are simply stuck in the 53-second-zone and are in desperate need of someone to bust her way out and lead the way.


											
										

In This Story

10
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

10 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brisbane Mick
8 years ago

The Adelaide pool where the current Aussie Titles are being held is a fast pool. James Magnussen swam a 47.10 100 M there in 2012 and now the fast times in both the Mens and Womens 100 M free.

If the Rio Olympic pool is a fast one, we may see some new Aussie World Record Holders.

bobo gigi
8 years ago

Nothing new and I always repeat the same things.
As a swim fan I will never understand why American’s sprint and especially American women’s sprint struggle so much internationally.
In the greatest swimming nation which dominates in so many events for so long, with some of the best coaches in the world, seeing that no American girl has ever swum under 53 and that the best Americans are around 1 second slower than the best world sprinters, that’s weird to me.
In the greatest swimming nation which has produced so many amazing athletes, which dominates in so many events for so long with some of the best coaches in the world, that’s even infamous in my opinion.… Read more »

OntarioSwimming
Reply to  bobo gigi
8 years ago

Could it be because they are short?

Robbos
Reply to  bobo gigi
8 years ago

As a swim fan, I am now confused at why you do not at least say well done to the Australian sprinters!!!!

When I see great swimmers as a swim fan, I can appreciate Ledecky, she will easily win the 400 & 800 in Rio & if her progression in the 200 is still on the upwards & nothing to say it;s not, I would not be surprised to see her in the 1.53s low & that would be untouchable for everyone else including Sjostram.

Dave Schraven
Reply to  bobo gigi
8 years ago

While sprinting is highly valued in high school and college swimming (primarily because of the sprint relays) in club swimming it is de-emphasized. Why don’t we swim the stroke 50s at national-level long course meets?

I believe this goes back to the “more is better” mentality that prevailed in the US for so long. Sprinting is seen as taking the easy way out. “Real” swimmers focus on the middle distance races, not the sprints.

Old habits die hard. Until they do, the status quo will prevail.

S.O.S. SaveOurSprinters
Reply to  Dave Schraven
8 years ago

AMEN! Maybe a hybrid of USRPT and traditional training is what we need. I still think USRPT would benefit from strength training.

Eric Lahmy
8 years ago

Well these Australian are fantastic but the truth is, also, that the American 100 meters women are not so fast and it is not new. But you know it is normal. You don’t want to have Katie Ledecky and the best sprinters in the world!!

Ervin
8 years ago

With the 50 and 100 SCY records going back and forth between Manuel and Weitzeil I’m curious to see what the Campbell sister could do in yards. Under 21 in the 50 and 45low/44high in the 100?

5wim
Reply to  Ervin
8 years ago

C1 is definitely much more a LCM swimmer, her stroke is so long and reaching i think a yards race would just be too short. C2 on the other hand i think would be more suited to it

Ok
Reply to  5wim
8 years ago

Um… C1 broke the 100m short course record this year. In SCY I would say 20.61 and 45.02

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »