2024 MEN’S NCAA SWIMMING AND DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS
- March 27-30, 2024
- IUPUI Natatorium, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Short Course Yards (25 yards)
- Meet Central
- Official Psych Sheets
- SwimSwam Preview Index
- SwimSwam Pick ‘Ems Contest
- Live Results
The Men’s NCAA Championships kick off on Wednesday in Indianapolis, and the question that always comes up pre-meet will try to be determined in this article: How will diving impact the team race?
When we score out the psych sheets, we know things aren’t going to go exactly as projected for a myriad of factors, with things such as taper, nerves, event schedules and everything else playing into how swimmers perform on the big stage.
In diving, there’s a different set of variables at play, as the NCAA qualifiers competed at five different Zone meets earlier this month, meaning there were five different sets of judges. Therefore, comparing scores across multiple meets is far from being an exact, definitive ranking, but it does give us some indication of who the favorites are heading into NCAAs.
Below, find the top 16 scores in each of the three men’s diving events across the five Zone meets (using finals results only), and how they would stack up against one another in an NCAA scoring format.
MEN’S 1-METER
Rank | Diver | Zone | Score | Points |
1 | Dylan Reed, Pitt | A | 774.95 | 20 |
2 | Nicholas Harris, Texas | D | 768.75 | 17 |
3 | Jack Ryan, Stanford | E | 765.50 | 16 |
4 | Victor Povzner, Texas A&M | D | 757.30 | 15 |
5 | Carson Tyler, Indiana | C | 756.35 | 14 |
6 | Noah Duperre, Texas | D | 755.80 | 13 |
7 | Yutong Wang, Minnesota | D | 734.10 | 12 |
8 | Shangfei Wang, USC | E | 733.45 | 11 |
9 | Daniel Knapp, Notre Dame | C | 733.10 | 9 |
10 | Clayton Chaplin, Ohio State | C | 729.25 | 7 |
11 | Lyle Yost, Ohio State | C | 727.05 | 6 |
12 | Aidan Wang, Princeton | A | 726.30 | 5 |
13 | Cameron Cash, Pitt | A | 713.65 | 4 |
14 | Takuto Endo, Texas A&M | D | 710.70 | 3 |
15 | Quinn Henninger, Indiana | C | 710.50 | 2 |
16 | Collier Dyer, Mizzou | D | 705.30 | 1 |
MEN’S 3-METER
Rank | Diver | Zone | Score | Points |
1 | Carson Tyler, Indiana | C | 910.65 | 20 |
2 | Jack Ryan, Stanford | E | 878.20 | 17 |
3 | Quinn Henninger, Indiana | C | 869.35 | 16 |
4 | Holden Higbie, Purdue | C | 839.20 | 15 |
5 | Carson Paul, LSU | D | 813.90 | 14 |
6 | Clayton Chaplin, Ohio State | C | 811.05 | 13 |
7 | Yutong Wang, Minnesota | D | 808.10 | 12 |
8 | Tanner Braunton, Texas | D | 806.00 | 11 |
9 | Max Fowler, Georgia Tech | B | 805.80 | 9 |
10 | Mohamed Farouk, Miami (FL) | B | 803.90 | 7 |
11 | Noah Duperre, Texas | D | 802.35 | 6 |
12 | Nicholas Harris, Texas | D | 791.35 | 5 |
13 | Cameron Cash, Pitt | A | 781.30 | 4 |
14 | Manuel Borowski, Texas | D | 780.50 | 3 |
15 | Dylan Reed, Pitt | A | 776.70 | 2 |
16 | Sebastian Otero, IUPUI | C | 774.25 | 1 |
MEN’S PLATFORM
Rank | Diver | Zone | Score | Points |
1 | Carson Tyler, Indiana | C | 854.55 | 20 |
2 | Bryden Hattie, Tennessee | B | 852.40 | 17 |
3 | Maxwell Weinrich, Indiana | C | 801.30 | 16 |
4 | Mohamed Farouk, Miami (FL) | B | 779.45 | 15 |
5 | Laurent Gosselin-Paradis, USC | E | 779.25 | 14 |
6 | Geoffrey Vavitsas, Cal | E | 775.10 | 13 |
7 | Andrew Bennett, Minnesota | D | 771.50 | 12 |
8 | Rhett Hensley, Texas A&M | D | 767.00 | 11 |
9 | Holden Higbie, Purdue | C | 738.00 | 9 |
10 | Mario Del Valle Jr, CBU | E | 733.05 | 7 |
11 | Anton Svirskyi, Florida | B | 731.90 | 6 |
12 | Alec Hubbard, TCU | D | 728.25 | 5 |
13 | Nicholas Stone, Tennessee | B | 725.60 | 4 |
14 | George Callanan, Princeton | A | 717.15 | 3 |
15 | Robert Gref, USC | E | 709.30 | 2 |
16 | Jesco Helling, FSU | B | 707.05 | 1 |
Looking back at last year’s projections and how things ultimately panned out, the Zone scores did a fairly decent job in determining where the points would come from in the diving events, though far from the accuracy we see from psych sheet points in swimming due to the various factors at play in diving.
Indiana junior Carson Tyler, the defending NCAA champion on platform, was the top Zone scorer in both the 3-meter and platform events, while his Hoosier teammates Quinn Henninger and Maxwell Weinrich are also positioned to score big. Henninger was 3rd on both 3-meter and platform last season.
Stanford’s Jack Ryan was another top Zone scorer with some pedigree behind his name, having placed 3rd on 1-meter in 2023, while Pitt fifth-year Dylan Reed leads the 1-meter standings.
Reed was 16th in the 1-meter event last season, but notably saw a stark improvement at the Zone A Championships from 2023 (628.80) to 2024 (774.95) in the event.
In the team Zone scores below, Indiana leads by a wide margin with 88 points, while Texas is a clear 2nd and Minnesota, Stanford and Pitt all project to crack 30.
SCORING THE ZONE RESULTS – TEAM STANDINGS
Rank | Team | 1M | 3M | PLATFORM | TOTAL |
1 | Indiana | 16 | 36 | 36 | 88 |
2 | Texas | 30 | 25 | 0 | 55 |
3 | Minnesota | 12 | 12 | 12 | 36 |
4 | Stanford | 16 | 17 | 0 | 33 |
5 | Pitt | 24 | 6 | 0 | 30 |
6 | Texas A&M | 18 | 0 | 11 | 29 |
7 | USC | 11 | 0 | 16 | 27 |
8 | Ohio State | 13 | 13 | 0 | 26 |
9 | Purdue | 0 | 15 | 9 | 24 |
10 | Miami (FL) | 0 | 7 | 15 | 22 |
11 | Tennessee | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 |
12 | LSU | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
13 | Cal | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
14 | Notre Dame | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
14 | Georgia Tech | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
16 | Princeton | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
17 | CBU | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
18 | Florida | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
19 | TCU | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
20 | Mizzou | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
20 | IUPUI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
20 | FSU | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
If we add in the projected diving scores with the psych sheet scores from the swimming events, here are the key takeaways:
- Two teams moved up two places inside the top 10: Indiana and Stanford. The Hoosiers jumped up from 6th into 4th, while the Cardinal moved from 9th to 7th.
- Texas’ diving used to propel into the title conversation. This season, it boosts them from 11th on the swimming psych sheets into the top 10, sitting 8th thanks to 55 projected diving points.
- Texas A&M, Ohio State and USC all move up three spots in the mid-tier range, with the Aggies now 14th, the Buckeyes 16th and the Trojans 19th.
- As the third-highest projected diving scoring team, Minnesota jumps four spots into 20th.
- Pitt and Purdue both go from having no psych sheet points to cracking the top 25 thanks to diving, while Miami (FL) and LSU sit 27th and 28th, respectively, solely due to their projected points from the boards.
PROJECTED SCORES: PSYCH SHEETS + ZONE RESULTS
Rank | School | Total | Individual | Relays | Diving |
1 | Arizona St | 538 | 345.5 | 192 | 0 |
2 | Florida | 449 | 267 | 176 | 6 |
3 | California | 311 | 158 | 140 | 13 |
4 | Indiana | 281.5 | 97.5 | 96 | 88 |
5 | NC State | 275 | 135 | 140 | 0 |
6 | Tennessee | 245.5 | 102.5 | 122 | 21 |
7 | Stanford | 198.5 | 89.5 | 76 | 33 |
8 | Texas | 187.5 | 82.5 | 50 | 55 |
9 | Virginia Tech | 176 | 78 | 98 | 0 |
10 | Georgia | 173 | 115 | 58 | 0 |
11 | Notre Dame | 151 | 66 | 76 | 9 |
12 | Auburn | 116.5 | 48.5 | 68 | 0 |
13 | Michigan | 103 | 49 | 54 | 0 |
14 | Texas A&M | 87 | 54 | 4 | 29 |
15 | Virginia | 78.5 | 36.5 | 42 | 0 |
16 | Ohio St | 73 | 37 | 10 | 26 |
17 | Alabama | 67.5 | 31.5 | 36 | 0 |
18 | Louisville | 62 | 28 | 34 | 0 |
19 | USC | 55 | 28 | 0 | 27 |
20 | Minnesota | 53 | 17 | 0 | 36 |
21 | Wisconsin | 51 | 25 | 26 | 0 |
22 | Penn St | 36 | 24 | 12 | 0 |
23 | FSU | 31 | 16 | 14 | 1 |
24 | Pitt | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
25 | Purdue | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
25 | Arizona | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0 |
27 | Miami (FL) | 22 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
28 | LSU | 18 | 2 | 2 | 14 |
29 | Brigham Young | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
29 | Penn | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
31 | Georgia Tech | 16 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
32 | SMU | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
33 | Mizzou | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
34 | Princeton | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
35 | CBU | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
36 | Brown | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
36 | Kentucky | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
38 | TCU | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
39 | Towson | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 |
40 | Utah | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
40 | IUPUI | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Texas’s top 2 platform divers shut it down in the Zones final and switched to easy dives garnering lower scores. Tanner Braunton has a good shot to A final at NCAAs, and Duperre B finaled last year
Wild.. TIL that divers will shut it down/coast like a swimmer into finals.
Yep, divers often put their highest DD dives in the last two slots. If they’re running away with it, it’s relatively easy for them to slot in a lower DD dive.
Also Carson Paul cut his DD in half for finals. Battle of Carsons for tower title most likely
Is there any possible way to get those IU pants (other than being on the team)?
Nevermind. Found them. $120
Yep. You can buy them from the Hoosier team store.
Very revealing article – If the readers want diving to GO AWAY vote DOWN, if the readers want diving to STAY vote UP.
So, show me on the stuffed cal bear, where did the diver hurt you?
We should also add in points from Water Polo and Synchronized Swimming while we are at it. Those sports have as much to do with competitive swimming as Diving does.
Do we have to debate this every year? It is what it is, and every coach knows the rules and can allocate scholarships however they want to maximize.
So you think Indiana and Texas would have better swim teams if they allocated diving scholarships to swimming?
I for one enjoy diving.
I’m curious how many diving NCAA Championships titles IU, Texas, Miami, and Purdue would have if they were separated. Not quite curious enough to go back and figure it out for myself, but I’m hopeful that someone is.
Diving should count as half points. Divers count as half a person for crying out loud
Eh, if they swim on a relay, they’re a full person. Since they have no “team” diving event, I think it’s fine.