You are working on Staging1

Pros and Cons of the New Olympic Events

The IOC announced today the additions of three new events to be added to the Olympic program, effective for the 2020 Tokyo Games. Finally, the men and women will be swimming the exact same distance races– the Olympics will look like the World Championships from a distance standpoint. We’ll actually get to see Katie Ledecky rip apart the field in the 1500, while distance swimmers worldwide will be able to get another shot at a podium finish.

Distance swimmers typically focus solely on freestyle, thus limiting the best milers from venturing into other events. A world-class sprinter, or somebody like Katinka Hosszu, would have more feasible options for secondary swims than a distance swimmer, who otherwise might only have the 800 or 1500 on their Olympic program. In addition to the relay potential for sprinters, since distance swimmers rarely have the range to make the 4×200 relay, another distance event gives those slow-twitch specialists one more option.

Are more distance events going to sell more tickets? Probably not in a significant way. There might be a bump from Ledecky swimming another event, but the 800 free (and especially the 1500) is notoriously known for being a commercial break race. And while TV spectators might hate those cuts in the middle of a distance race, empty stands are evidence that people aren’t showing up in throngs for these races in person.

Meanwhile, the mixed medley relay has its own set of pros and cons. The pros are simple: more racing (yes!), more relays (yes!!), more sprints (yes!!!). Comebacks are fun to watch, like the mile at the 2016 Men’s NCAA Championships, but comebacks over the course of a single sprint leg (a la Michael Chadwick in Windsor) are even more exciting. On the other end of that, the 2015 Worlds showed that the event wasn’t taken very seriously, and some top swimmers were notably absent from that relay. That could, of course, change as it becomes a more common events at such big championships.

Additionally, the back and forth exchanges in a 400 mixed medley relay are pretty exhilarating to watch. Depending on the order and sex of the swimmers on a given relay, a team that started off in 8th can jump to 3rd, then to 6th, then to 1st in just a few minutes, and vice versa. And, assuming the world’s best show up for the relay, we’ll get to see more big swims, like an additional 100 breast from Adam Peaty.

Still, the mixed medley relay is a new idea for the international stage, and one that many swimming stars may not mesh with. These new additions will add more time to prelims and finals sessions, and some stars may opt out of them to focus on their already-set races.

The leveling out of distance events is certainly a positive step towards gender equality in the sport. Let’s not forget that men were allowed to swim the 1500 free in 1904– 64 years before women could race the 800. However, we’ll have to wait and see how the new events settle into the international swimming scene as new Olympic medal opportunities.

30
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

30 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
torchberaer
7 years ago

I don’t like the often flukey nature of 50s- I think the 800m and 1500m additions are more in the spirit of the Olympics. More relays just benefit the same couple of countries with depth.

Coach dave
7 years ago

Let’s do more fun stuff
Not live for time alone

Coach mary
7 years ago

At our local champs they swim a 15 and up medley and free relay. 2 men-2women. It is the most exciting relay in the meet!!!

coachdaggi
7 years ago

The real problem here for me is the reduction of the number of swimmers. We will have more events, but even less swimmers will take part, while FINA is still increasing the number of member-nations. the 22-swimmer cut is pretty much exactly the number of invitees to Rio. This means that for a normal nation, the A-cut will be the required qualification time to take part, and if nothing is changed, this is the time necessary to reach semifinals in the last olympics. In Rio, this was already almost the case, whereas in London there were something between 150 or 170 invitees, or 7-8 per race.
It changed in Rio due to the increased number of achieved A-cuts and… Read more »

Rafael
7 years ago

I was hopping to see that they add 50 breast, fly and back… Bummer

Cam
7 years ago

I don’t think there should be any mixed relays… Instead I think they should’ve added the 50’s instead. They’re fast, they’re exciting, they’re fun, they’ll sell more tickets.

Courtney
7 years ago

They should definitely add the women’s 1500 free! .. I always thought that should’ve been an Olympic event anyways for girls..
Some swimmers are great distance freestyles and this event would be a great opportunity for them. Some are better at 1500 then 800. .. who cares if the spectators get bored!.. The true swim fans will want to see this event!

DMacNCheez
7 years ago

Pro: Ledecky with potentially 8-9 medal chances in 2020!

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »