See also:
- Women’s honorable mentions
- Women’s classes #13-16
- Women’s classes #9-12
- Women’s classes #1-4
- Men’s honorable mentions
- Men’s classes #13-16
- Men’s classes #9-12
- Men’s classes #5-8
- Men’s classes #1-4
- Individual recruit rankings – Girls final rankings (April 2020)
- Individual recruit rankings – Boys final rankings (April 2020)
We continue our spring recruiting series with a team-by-team look at the best recruiting classes entering the NCAA next season. The classes below are projected freshmen for the 2020-2021 season. Of course, the coronavirus pandemic presents a number of wrinkles to this analysis: some athletes didn’t get a senior-year taper meet. Some high-end recruits may opt to defer their enrollment for a year to prepare for the Tokyo Olympics. There’s also still the possibility that the 2020-2021 school year is delayed, along with NCAA sports. All things considered, these ranks are based on the 2020-2021 NCAA season happening, but as we usually view these recruiting classes over their projected four years of college swimming, a potential delay or cancellation of the upcoming season doesn’t have as big an impact on this analysis as it would seem.
A few important notes on our rankings:
- The rankings listed are based on our Class of 2020 Re-Rank from just last month. “HM” refers to our honorable mentions.
- Like most of our rankings, these placements are subjective. We base our team ranks on a number of factors: prospects’ incoming times are by far the main factor, but we also consider potential upside in the class, class size, relay impact and team needs filled. Greater weight is placed on known success in short course yards, so foreign swimmers are slightly devalued based on the difficulty in converting long course times to short course production.
- Transfers are included.
- For the full list of all verbally committed athletes, click here. A big thank-you to SwimSwam’s own Anne Lepesant for compiling that index – without it, rankings like these would be far less comprehensive.
Previously ranked:
- #16: Texas A&M Aggies
- #15: Alabama Crimson Tide
- #14: Georgia Bulldogs
- #13: Virginia Tech H2Okies
- #12: Northwestern Wildcats
- #11: Ohio State Buckeyes
- #10: Michigan Wolverines
- #9: NC State Wolfpack
#8: Tennessee Volunteers
- Top-tier additions: Mona McSharry (Ireland – breast/free), Jasmine Rumley (IA – sprint free), Kristen Stege (East Carolina transfer- distance free), Elle Caldow (VA – free/back), Olivia Harper (ME – back), Berit Quass (IA – fly)
- The rest: Aly Breslin (PA – free), Annie Rimmer (TN – fly/free), Jordan Aurnou-Rhees (OH – free/fly), Lauren Barakey (VA – breast), Margaret Marando (OH – fly), Nicola Lane (OH – free/back), Peyton Spearry (OH – back)
Tennessee didn’t get any ranked domestic prospects, but Ireland’s Mona McSharry is definitely at the level of a top-10 recruit. Her long course breaststroke times (1:07.4/2:27.4) suggest she could be an NCAA A final contender as a freshman and beyond. She’s also a 25.4 freestyler in long course, probably translates to somewhere in the 22s in yards. That makes McSharry a massive relay weapon, and a much-needed one after Tennessee graduated most of its top relay swimmers.
Jasmine Rumley is a high-ceiling sprinter who played three sports (swimming, softball, track) at a high level in high school and saw her 100 free drop significant time as she focused in more on swimming. She’s 22.2/49.0 in the sprints, and should have a lot of fast swimming ahead of her in a program that just took Erika Brown from a no-name prospect into one of the best sprinters in college history.
Those two are supplemented by distance swimmer Kristen Stege (16:11/4:43.8 and an extremely fast-rising freshman miler at ECU last year) and backstrokers Elle Caldow (53.5/1:57.2) and Olivia Harper (53.5/1:56.8), plus flyer Berit Quass (53.6/1:58.9). This is a big class with a lot of developmental types, which is important to restock the roster after the graduations of Brown, Tessa Cieplucha, Stanzi Moseley, and Meghan Small.
#7: Wisconsin Badgers
- Top-tier additions: #3 Phoebe Bacon (MD – back/fly), Kaylyn Schoof (WI – back),
- The rest: Cal Dunn (IL – IM), Elle Braun (PA – distance free), Emily Ecker (ME – distance free), Emma Lasecki (WI – IM), Mallory Jackson (IN – back), Alex Anagnostopoulos (WI – breast)
The top of this class nationally is incredible, and Phoebe Bacon is one of the better NCAA prospects we’ve seen in the past decade. With backstroke times of 50.7 and 1:50.7, she’d be an instant NCAA title contender if there wasn’t a world record-holder coming into the NCAA in her same class. That said, Bacon goes to a Wisconsin program that turned 51-second high school backstroker Beata Nelson into the college swimmer of the year as a junior, so there’s plenty to be excited about.
Bacon’s 51.7 fly, 1:55.3 IM, 1:00.3 breaststroke and 22.4/49.2 freestyles should fill in wherever Wisconsin needs on its relays. The backstroke group reloads in a big way despite the graduation of Nelson. In-state prospect Kaylyn Schoof is 52.7 and 1:54.5 in back and will make a great training partner for Bacon in a stout 1-2 punch. The rest of the class will need some time to develop. Cal Dunn and Emma Lasecki build up the IM group, Elle Braun and Emily Ecker are milers who swim down to 1:49s in the 200 free, Mallory Jackson is a backstroker and Alex Anagnostopoulos a breaststroker.
#6: Louisville Cardinals
- Top-tier additions: #13 Tristen Ulett (GA – fly/IM), #14 Gabi Albiero (KY – fly/free), Paige Hetrick (PA – back), Liberty Williams (CA – distance free), Olivia Livingston (PA – free)
- The rest: Paige McCormick (OH – IM), Addie Farrington (GA – breast), Kayla Wilson (TX – diving)
Louisville doesn’t have a single swimmer of Bacon’s caliber, but does bring in three swimmers who made our recruiting re-rank. Tristen Ulett of Georgia and Gabi Albiero of Kentucky are very similar butterflyers (52.0/1:55.7 for Ulett; 51.9/1:55.8 for Albiero) who should provide some free relay coverage, too. Ulett is also a great IMer (1:56.5), and perhaps gives Louisville an inside track at her younger sister, highly-touted recruit Rye.
Albiero follows the footsteps of her brother, All-American Nicolas Albiero, to swim for their father Arthur at Louisville. She’s a 22.3/49.3 freestyler who should stay busy on relay duty with the Cardinals. Both Ulett and Albiero come in at a great time, as Louisville just lost top flyer Grace Oglesby and free relay legs Casey Fanz and Lainey Visscher.
Paige Hetrick could go a number of ways as a prospect. She’s got 52.8/1:53.0 backstrokes, but also great freestyle range, from 22.8/49.1 to 1:45.7/4:47. She and Olivia Livingston (22.7/49.4/1:49.5) should help rebuild the free relays.
Liberty Williams is more of a distance prospect, with a 16:21 mile that would have been only about four seconds off an NCAA invite in 2020. Addie Farrington adds 1:01.0/2:12.3 breaststroke speed, and Paige McCormick is a solid IMer (4:14.6/2:01.9) who also swims a 4:48 in the 500 free.
#5: USC Trojans
- Top-tier additions: #7 Kaitlyn Dobler (OR – breast/free), Jade Hannah (Canada – back/free), Anicka Delgado (CA – sprint free), Andrea Santander (FL – sprint free), Caroline Famous (PA – back/free)
- The rest: Adair Sand (FL – free), Caraline Baker (CO – breast), Johanna Jorgenson (MI – free), Katelyn Yule (CA – free/back)
USC went all-in on sprint freestyle with this recruiting class, and that has to be a bonus for whoever takes over the vacant head coaching job there. Kaitlyn Dobler is the kind of prospect retired coach Dave Salo generally thrived on. She’s a sprint breast/free combo with the best 50 free (22.01) in the domestic recruiting class and one of the better 100 breaststrokes (58.3) we’ve ever seen in a U.S. recruit. Throw in a 2:09.5 in the 200 breast and 48.6 in the 100 free, and you’ve got a swimmer who could be scoring in multiple individual events as a freshman and perhaps swimming the full slate of four relays and three individuals.
The Trojans also added Canadian standout Jade Hannah, who has long course backstrokes (59.6/2:09.2) and freestyles (25.8/56.2) that should convert to roughly NCAA invite level and thoroughly bolster USC’s relays in the absence of graduated star Louise Hansson. Hannah, in particular, has to be a deferred enrollment candidate as a Canadian Olympic contender, but there’s a chance USC could build medley relays on a Hannah-Dobler pairing for years to come.
Then it’s just sprint depth on sprint depth. Anicka Delgado is a California high school product who goes 22.5 and 49.3 in sprint free. Andrea Santander out of Florida is 22.9/49.6/1:47.0, Michigan’s Johanna Jorgenson is 22.8/50.0/1:47.4, and Florida’s Adair Sand 23.4/49.6/1:48.9. Caroline Famous is a 53.6 backstroker, but also 22.9 in the 50 free.
Then USC got one of the many strong breaststrokers in this class, with Colorado’s Caraline Baker (1:01.7/2:12.8) coming down from altitude to join the noted breaststroke factory.
Did I miss something about Erica Sullivan? She committed to USC back in 18 then deferred enrollment to stay home to train this year. But not listed as USC for fall 2020…?
Per previous responses from Jared and Braden, they count deferrals in their original class and don’t recount them In their new class. Transfers count, deferrals don’t.
Also, Didn’t she say she is waiting to see who the new coach is?
What everyone is clamoring to know: Will DeSorbo Effect lose his mind if UVA isn’t ranked #1? Will he come out of his hole, see his shadow, and return to hibernation?
Katelyn Yule did not sign with the #8 Tennessee volunteers. She is attending #5 USC per her Instagram bio.
Are we just going to ignore the depth that Auburn is bringing in with their class? Sure, they may not have many people in the top 20 ranked in their class according to SwimSwam, but take a look at the well-roundedness of each girl in their class. Examples, Colby Hurt in the distance free, IM, and breaststroke events, Hannah Ownbey in the IM and breaststroke events, and many other girls. Each girl in their class has a multitude of events. No, they probably shouldn’t be in the top 4, but they should definitely have been included on this list somewhere.
Maggie Gholston, Payton Marvin, Kensley Merritt and Meghan Lee are very well rounded. Not to mention, Abigail Gibbons and Elysse Pardus excel in the fly events, Emma Steckiel in the sprint freestyle events, and Brynn Curtis in the breaststroke events.
Versatility is valued significantly less I would imagine. After all, these are national ranks, so the emphasis would be on NCAAs. Teams that are competing for higher placement nationally, I would assume, would much rather have a one-trick pony that scores 10 points at NCAAs than someone who can score 30 at a conference meet. That is not to say that these swimmers in Auburn’s class (or other classes full of versatile swimmers) can’t develop into NCAA scorers, just that an almost surefire national level scorer is valued much higher, and rightly so.
Where did these swimmers place at the 2019 Phillips 66 National Championships?
Hannah Owenby’s best times would have scored 1 point at SECs last year. Colby Hurt would’ve scored about 15.
It is totally a deep class. But when your class as a whole has times that would score less than 20 at the conference meet…that doesn’t impress me. Not on the women’s side, where swimmers come out of high school with NCAA title-winning times already.
Who do they bump? Texas A&M, another SEC school, is #16, lowest-ranked class on the list. Their top swimmer, Chloe Stepanek, has times that would outscore the entire Auburn class on her own. A&M has at least 3 breaststrokers in their class that are faster than every breaststroker you named.
So, you would bump A&M out… Read more »
As a point of reference, Regan Smith finished first and Lillie Nordmann finished second in the women’s 200m butterfly at the 2019 Phillips 66 National Championships. Where were these Auburn swimmers?
Relax.
Relax does not answer the question.
I’ll have more of an answer on this tomorrow (don’t want to give away who made/didn’t make the top four), but for reference, here are the notable times I had in Auburn’s class, which is definitely impressive in its depth, though there’s no single standout:
I just don’t see any way they can’t at least be better than most of the honorable mentions…..
so can u explain why AU is not even a HM but schools w even less stand out swimmers are???
Maybe it was close and they made a judgement call.
Maybe they made a mistake.
Maybe we can all be thankful that there’s a team of individuals willing to work jobs that promote the sport of swimming instead of taking jobs in industries that are far more lucrative. I certainly appreciate Swimswam’s work, even if they aren’t perfect all the time.
And ya know, maybe the Aurburn class just wasn’t good enough and your daughter/niece/friend can go prove everyone else wrong for next four years!
Now that ranks are completely published – felt there was a dropoff from the nine schools we listed as honorable mentions to the next 3-4 that didn’t make the list. Most of those just outside (Kentucky, Minnesota, Auburn) were big, well-rounded classes, but without any really immediate-impact types in the mix.
As far as Auburn goes, the class is nicely rounded. But when you compare to our honorable mentions, they’re just a little behind in every stroke. Harvard has arguably three better breaststrokers (1:00.7/2:12.3; 1:01.8/2:13.8, 1:01.0/2:16) and two better sprinters (22.8/49.8; 49.8/1:47.5). Arkansas and FSU both have elite international sprinters, which can be a massive difference-maker in NCAA scoring. UCLA’s international breaststroker (1:09.1/2:28.6) and domestic flyer (53.3/1:57.9) are both faster… Read more »
My predictions:
(4) Cal
(3) Texas
(2) Virginia
(1) Stanford
Virginia and Stanford have amazing classes!
I think it depends how you factor in Smith. Do you account for 2 years of her scoring or all 4?
The Franklin/Ledecky precedent suggests she’ll be pro before her senior year, but sure the SwimSwam guts have more insight.
I think it will ultimately come down to the NCAA pro rules (re Smith’s NCAA scoring years).
No way is Auburn top 4. For the class of 2021 that’s a conversation, but not this class.
Auburn has to be somewhere, this leaves me confused cause I don’t think they’re top 4 but they’re at least top 16, probably top 10, and there is no way they aren’t top 25 (including the the honorable mentions)!!
AU needs to recruit and coach em up…stop yer whining. I just breathing ez that the GirlVOLS are in the top 8! With this great class, the amazing coaching, coonskin caps and our girl swimmers and divers learning clogging, we gonna be great.
Stay classy Tennessee.
Lady Vol Disser is obviously a troll account on many different pages that doesn’t represent Tennessee
I misquoted.
You stay classy Tennessee – Ron Burgundy
https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.dLa3VmTLQdkuktOPHyCqyQHaD9&pid=Api&H=85&W=160&P=0
Now dont get yer coonskin in a wad…
Which “stars” did they sign that are guaranteed points at ncaas?
Who’s left? Cal-Texas-STAN-UVA?
Yep, it’ll be interesting so see who is at the top UVA or Stanford. Although Stanford got the best swimmer in the class, UVA got Walsh and others
Personally I think Stanford will be at the top, although UVA will be close. Excited to see the final rankings.
I’m curious too.
Those are two classes that would be slam dunk #1s in most seasons.
I didn’t realize Lillie Nordmann was “chopped liver”.
https://youtu.be/HYv_cZOCXfc