You are working on Staging1

Rio Battle with Ledecky was Sjöström’s Last 200 Free at a Major Champs

Sarah Sjöström has confirmed in an interview with Swedish news site SVT that she does not plan on competing in the 200 free at a major championships again. This came after she swam a 1:56.44 in the event to win the Swedish Nationals title tonight in Boras, Sweden. That time ranks her 8th in the world this year.

The 100 butterfly world record holder’s agent told NBC earlier this month that she wouldn’t race the 200 free this summer in Budapest at Worlds. Tonight, though, we learned that she won’t be racing it at another major meet like the World Champs, the Olympics, or the European LC Champs (in non-Olympic years). She didn’t specify what she meant by ‘major,’ but those three meets would cover each of the biggest summer meets that she competes at during a quadrennial, and we probably won’t see her swim this race again with a full taper.

Sjöström is an excellent 200 freestyler. Her lifetime best of 1:54.08 from her showdown with Katie Ledecky is the fifth-fastest time ever done, and she’s the 4th-best performer in the event behind world record holder Federica Pellegrini (1:52.98), Olympic record holder Allison Schmitt (1:53.61) and Ledecky (1:53.73). She also holds the 6th- (1:54.31) and 7th- (1:54.34) best times in history. Sjöström has been the closest to making Ledecky look human in an individual finals race at a major international meet– in their 200 free battle last year, the Swede (29.13) out-split the American (29.18) on the final 50, and finished less than four tenths behind her at the wall.

Sjöström didn’t say that she was done with the event completely– she did say tonight that she’ll use the 200 free as a training race (like she did tonight at Swedish Nationals).

Without the 200 free on her main schedule, Sjöström has been training for pure sprint events. As we’ve seen this year, dropping the 200 is paying off in big ways for her. She has been very close to world records in the 50 and 100 freestyle multiple times this year, and is setting herself up for huge performances in Budapest at worlds. Most recently, tonight she broke the Swedish 50 back record and dropped under 28 seconds for the first time ever.

In This Story

11
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

11 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Newt CJ
7 years ago

they all have this kind of plastic smile…rather fake 🙁

Tea rex
7 years ago

Once upon a time, Natalie Coughlin could have been a WR 200 backstroker. But she didn’t like training for that distance, so she didn’t. At the time I thought she was crazy not swimming the 2 bk. But as her career stretched into her 30s, I saw she was much happier swimming, and kept with it longer, because she didn’t try to be like Phelps and win as many events as humanly possible.

Steve Nolan
Reply to  Tea rex
7 years ago

Hell, Phelps could’ve been a WR 200 backstroker. Or like, 1500 freestyler.

He was good.

Joe
Reply to  Tea rex
7 years ago

Good point. As the career goes on, motivation becomes key. And if you have options, why not follow your heart? Sjostrom has by the way said she’s planning to compete in many Olympics to come.

John26
7 years ago

I’m inclined to think she has been indecisive about the 200 distance for the last 6 years of her life. She has given the 50free, 100 free and 200free similar amounts of attention with (relatively) compromised results. I think her silver medal and her current sprint times have put in perspective what she is capable of without that indecisiveness and just going with it.

Prickle
7 years ago

I don’t understand what makes Sarah Sjostrom to hate this distance so much. Maybe because 1:54.08 is twice as hard as 52.08. Maybe she hates to lose. But she didn’t compete at 200 before Ledecky neither.
People say that training for 200 hurts her sprinting abilities. How?
I don’t understand her. If it was some other swimmer I would assume that she isn’t just a hard worker. But we are talking about exceptionally gifted person. Elite of elite. One cannot be at such level without sweat and pain.
I don’t understand.

Carlo
Reply to  Prickle
7 years ago

Losing is a terrible and bad thing. Nothing positive about it I would assume

Steve Nolan
Reply to  Prickle
7 years ago

Take training out of it, it still adds races to her meet program. She was pretty dead by the time the 50 free showed up in Rio, not even making the final.

Baker-King-Vollmer-Manuel
Reply to  Prickle
7 years ago

As was the case with Abbey Weitzeil, Sarah Sjöström failed to qualify for the final of the 50 free at the 2016 Rio Olympics. Sarah Sjöström had to settle for bronze in the 100 free at the 2016 Rio Olympics.

Steve Nolan
7 years ago

Well, never say never, grrl.

Prolly not a terrible decision, though. Wonder if that also rules off 4×200 relays?

Joe
Reply to  Steve Nolan
7 years ago

She will swim it in relays. But Sweden will not swim that relay again until a fourth swimmer arrives. Could be Euros next year, could be in Tokyo. Could be never.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »