You are working on Staging1

Shouts From The Stands: 2022 Men’s NCAA Swimming Dual Meet Championships

SwimSwam welcomes reader submissions about all topics aquatic, and if it’s well-written and well-thought, we might just post it under our “Shouts from the Stands” series. We don’t necessarily endorse the content of the Shouts from the Stands posts, and the opinions remain those of their authors. If you have thoughts to share, please send [email protected].

This “Shouts from the Stands” submission comes from Bob Groseth.

Berkeley, California 1:52 p.m. Pacific time, March 22, 2022

Bjorn Carlson can’t even hear himself think as he stands behind Lane 4 for the final event of the final meet of the 2022 NCAA Dual Meet Championships. The cheers of “Go Bears – Go Bears” are being piped in from all across the country into the University of California pool.

Austin, Texas 3:52 p.m. Central time March 22,2022

1,499.90 miles away in Austin, Texas, Adam Stanley is getting ready to step up in Lane 5 in the University of Texas pool amid cheers of “Longhorns – Longhorns” piped in from throughout the U.S. As Adam hears a whistle, he sneaks a glance at the UT video board to see Bjorn step up on his block, 1.5 million people are also watching through the PAC 10 and Big 12 streaming services. He steps up.

The meet has gone down to the final relay – the winner will be the 2022 NCAA Champion. In Loveland, Colorado, the technical crew at Colorado Timing is ready to start the last event. They have calculated the time to send the start signal 812.12 miles to Austin and 940.82 miles to Berkeley to within .0001 second so both swimmers will have a fair start. Right underneath Lane 4 in California is a set of Luma Lanes. The Texas pool has its own set of Luma Lanes in Lane 5. Each swimmer will have a small transmitter in his cap that sends a signal to the Luma Lanes. Bjorn will be able to see “Adam” swimming right underneath him. On the video board the signals from the two streaming systems are blended so that Bjorn’s and Adam’s teammates and the 1.5 million streaming patrons will see the race as if they were both in the same pool. The starter in Loveland announces “Take your mark” and after a slight pause, the START signal is sent to both pools and arrives at exactly the same time. Swimming fans across the country move up to the edge of their seats.

Two years prior, the College Swimming Coaches of America’s Executive Board contacted the leading contractors in timing systems, lane pacers and video boards to make a proposal to run “Virtual Meets.” The Covid-19 Pandemic had marched on through the summer of 2020, as second- and third-wave spikes hit the country and in particular college campuses that had brought back athletes to train. Unfortunately, vaccination trials failed to provide a safe and effective answer to combat the virus. On college campuses all “contact” sports were banned, and non-contact sports had to bring a plan through the Athletic Directors and Conference Commissioners to the NCAA Competition Committee for approval. By using the technology available, the CSCAA pitched a series of virtual meets. Studies had already shown that a chlorinated swimming pool was one of the safest places to be amid populations struggling with the Covid-19 virus. Strict distancing would be enforced for both athletes and coaches during practices and meets. Swimmers could go to school online on Campus or at home, needing only to show up on Campus for the meets. Fans would be safe because they were in their own homes, watching the meets on their TVs or devices. Team travel costs would be cut by millions of dollars, and parents who were spending up to $800 each weekend to watch their sons and daughters would save up to $4,000 a year for each family. The pilot program was approved.

By 2021 all the Power 5 Conference teams were using the technology, and its cost was being driven down by the volume of teams that ended up using the Virtual Meet system. In 2021 the CSCAA Competition Committee designed a 16-team Dual Meet Playoff system. Each Conference would run a dual meet playoff within their Conference during the regular season. The winners from the top 8 Swimming Conferences (Power 5 plus 3 others) would gain automatic berths and the CSCAA Competition Committee would select the next 8 teams based on a “Power Point” system. A couple of adjustments were made in the format. The old 5-3-1/ 7-0 scoring system was instituted in the 16-team playoff system. The 1,650 free and 1-meter diving was the first event and the Relays were all swum at the end of the meet (only 400 medley and 400 free). The 50, 100 and 200 Freestyle, plus a 200 of each stroke and the IM were included. Three-meter diving was run after the last individual event but before the last two relays. Divers each did 5 dives with a maximum total degree of difficulty of 12.5.

The country’s thirst for competition and the simplicity of the new scoring system tripled the viewers from the 2021 season, which had included the 2021 NCAA Championship Playoff. The 2022 season was on pace to making Swimming and Diving the No. 1 revenue sport in colleges and universities. ESPN made a bid to Broadcast the entire 16-team playoff for the 2023 through 2028 seasons. The semifinals and finals would be broadcast in Prime Time. Officials in Off Track Betting contacted the NCAA Competition Committee proposing a revenue sharing pitch to be able to broadcast the final 3 meets of the Playoffs on their sites. Committee officials have not yet commented on their proposal.

Austin Texas and Berkeley California

It’s one minute and 50 seconds later, the anchor swimmers step up on the blocks as their teammates approach their turns at the 275. Turns completed they see their teammates and the lights of their opponents approaching. Their teammates are on their feet and 1.5 million viewers are screaming at their TV’s and Computers as they take off virtually together……………………..?

14
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

14 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Importer AND Exporter
4 years ago

Fun read and an important area in which to be brainstorming news ways of competition. Thanks!

D3 Coach
4 years ago

I know this is basically a sci-fi article because in the real world Colorado can’t even design systems to work consistently when they are hardwired in a single facility. There is no way they would be able to create a virtual system working in real time in multiple venues across the country. This is like an 80’s movie showing everyone in the year 2000 in their personal hovercrafts.

Z.H.
4 years ago

Wasn’t Bruce Willis I in this movie?

Woke Stasi
4 years ago

Get Ready for COVID-22: Wuhan II “This time it’s personal.”

“In a world gone mad …”

Tupperware
4 years ago

You had me until “No.1 revenue sport”

Coach
4 years ago

We do realize that realize that virtual meets make facilities a big factor? If administrators can use “inadequate facilities” as a reason to drop programs now, just imagine Michigan State having to swim all of their meets at their home pool. Or TCU. It’s one thing to say lesser facilities impact recruiting or make training logistics more difficult. We’re talking a completely different level when it puts you at a disadvantage in literally every meet you are in.

Heck even the example here points it out. Berkley outdoors vs UT indoors, at one of the premier facilities in the country.

I get this is just a “fun” (dystopian horror?) little article, but I’m hearing this idea get thrown… Read more »

Robert Groseth
Reply to  Coach
4 years ago

Thanks Coach for reading and commenting on the article. I, of course, considered the difference in Facilities. Working out a system to rate each pool would take too long and take away from the concept. Bottom line, the alternative is no competition and no College swimming. Choice was easy. We all hope that none of this happens, but if it does the Swimming Community needs to be ready to act. This is just one way it could be done.

Questionable
Reply to  Robert Groseth
4 years ago

Choice is easy. Its been known and undisputed that chlorine kills covid. Just like UV does. Screen athletes before the meet and continue on as normal otherwise risk losing the majority of non-revenue sports.

NC Swim Fan
Reply to  Questionable
4 years ago

@questionable I guess you are intentionally missing the point to make your point since we can all agree that the time in the actual pool is the least risky/contagious part of the whole affair. Travel, lodging, dining, pool decks, officials/timers, spectators…”continue on as normal” ignores the complete system of a swim meet and the intersection of so many somewhat distinct human pods. Fingers crossed the vaccines don’t all fail, but pretending ‘normal’ in ‘21 or ‘22 is the same as in ‘19 without a vaccine is just naive or willfully ignorant.

The Importer AND Exporter
Reply to  Coach
4 years ago

After watching Athlete A I’m thinking the pool is the least of Michigan State’s problems.

Swimming Admn
4 years ago

Unfortunately, local club swimming will be effected if virtual meets take the place of invitational meets. Host clubs that count on splash fees and LSC‘S that collect an administration fee for each splash will financially suffer hardships. Just something to think about as we safely move forward. Our organization is already budgeting for a $40 k revenue loss for the next 12 months. That $40k has always gone to enhance the swimmers in and out of water experiences, support coaches education and training and purchase needed equipment and help maintain facilities. But, we all understandably know that we most stop/slow the spread of the virus. Continued tough times ahead. Keep the Faith. Make adjustments and be smart planners.

Scogdawg
4 years ago

could definitely do this with swim and dive. For diving , the judges watch the dive on zoom , enter their scores and the next diver goes from their home pool. Run it just like a regular meet but everyone is at their home pool. No hotels, spectators , buses, planes, etc. keep the social distancing and make this work until we are safe to resume travel.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »