You are working on Staging1

So About Those Stiff British Swimming World C’ships Qualification Standards

2019 BRITISH SWIMMING CHAMPIONSHIPS

After all is said and done with the 2019 British Swimming Championships, a 25-swimmer roster has been revealed for this summer’s World Championships in Gwangju, Korea.

Among the lineup, just 5 individuals won specific events and also got under the British Swimming-mandated automatic selection time: Adam Peaty in the men’s 100m breast, Daniel Jervis in the 1500m free, Max Litchfield in the 400m IM, Duncan Scott in the 100m free, 200m free and 200mIM and finally James Wilby in the 200m breast.

However, an additional number of athletes were selected for the roster based on achieving a British Swimming-mandated consideration time in their event or by earning 2nd place in their event still under the selection time. Those in this category include Molly Renshaw, Alys Thomas, Ross Murdoch, Ben Proud, Luke Greenbank, James Guy, Freya Anderson, Aimee Willmott, Tom Dean and Siobhan-Marie O’Connor.

To add yet another layer to qualification process, the British Swimming selection policy specifies 8 wild card spots that would be at the coaches’ discretion, factoring in the need to qualify relay teams for the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games, the use of alternates to rest key athletes, etc. Among those swimmers identified in this grouping include Jess Fullalove, Anna Hopkin and Scott McLay.

You can review the entire roster as a refresher here.

British Swimming tells SwimSwam that individuals’ specific events will not be revealed until the day before competition begins in Korea. As such, look for another analysis post shortly, detailing who we think will be selected to swim which events based on times, other athletes nominated for the roster, etc.

Below, however, is a snapshot view of who was selected specifically based on the supposedly black-and-white qualification system. I’ve included data to compare who would have made the list had British Swimming utilized the FINA A standard as the QT as opposed to its ultra-stiff selection standards.

Had the FINA A standard been used, 8 swimmers not on the list below would have qualified for individual events, with 6 of them being female and 2 male. Chloe GoldingJocelyn Ulyett, Katie Matts, Charlotte Atkinson, Alicia Wilson and Abbie Wood would have all made the World Championships line-up in their respective events listed below, as they dipped under the FINA A cut.

For the men, David Cumberlidge and Mark Szaranek would have made the grade if they competed for any other nation using FINA A cuts as the qualification criteria to make the Worlds roster.

 

Women British Automatic Standard British Consideration Standard FINA A cut British Selection for Worlds Alternative Selection Method 1st Swimmer Finals Time 2nd Swimmer Finals Time
50 free 24.21 24.50 25.04 X Anna Hopkin 24.99 X
100 free 52.72 53.95 54.49 Freya Anderson Freya Anderson
Anna Hopkin
53.79 54.02
200 free 1:55.82 1:56.66 1:58.66 X Freya Anderson
Holly Hibbott
1:58.22 1:58.23
400 free 4:03.57 4:06.39 4:10.57 X Holly Hibbott 4:08.50 X
800 free 8:20.53 8:24.38 8:38.56 X X X X
1500 free 15:57.85 16:03.60 16:32.04 X X X X
100 back 59.12 59.47 1:00.59 X Georgia Davies 1:00.31 X
200 back 2:06.82 2:08.05 2:11.53 X Jessica Fullalove
Chloe Golding
2:09.74 2:10.53
100 breast 1:06.26 1:06.66 1:07.43 X Jocelyn Ulyett 1:07.35 X
200 breast 2:22.22 2:23.95 2:25.91 Molly Renshaw Molly Renshaw
Katie Matts
2:23.42 2:25.58
100 fly 57.22 57.56 58.48 X Alys Thomas
Charlotte Atkinson
58.20 58.30
200 fly 2:07.13 2:07.89 2:09.21 Alys Thomas Alys Thomas
Laura Stephens
2:07.40 2:07.96
200 IM 2:09.80 2:10.48 2:13.03 Siobhan-Marie O’Connor Siobhan-Marie O’Connor
Alicia Wilson
2:10.34 2:11.60
400 IM 4:35.09 4:37.01 4:43.06 Aimee Willmott Aimee Willmott
Abbie Wood
4:36.98 4:40.44
4×100 free relay 3:35.64 X
(collective time 3:38.46 from women’s 100m free final)
4×200 free relay 7:53.66 X
(collective time 7:55.35 from women’s 200m free final)
4×100 medley relay 3:58.35 X
(collective time 3:59.65 from women’s individual finals)
Men British Automatic Standard British Consideration Standard FINA A cut British Selection for Worlds Alternative Selection Method 1st Swimmer Finals Time 2nd Swimmer Finals Time
50 free 21.45 21.84 22.18 Ben Proud Ben Proud
David Cumberlidge
21.50 22.09
100 free 48.00 48.43 48.80 Duncan Scott Duncan Scott 47.87 X
200 free 1:45.70 1:46.47 1:47.40 Duncan Scott
James Guy
Duncan Scott
James Guy
1:45.63 1:46.34
400 free 3:45.32 3:46.87 3:48.15 X Daniel Jervis 3:47.57 X
800 free 7:46.75 7:49.71 7:54.31 X X X X
1500 free 14:48.40 14:59.36 15:07.38 Daniel Jervis Daniel Jervis 14:46.51 X
100 back 52.66 53.32 54.06 X Luke Greenbank 53.92 X
200 back 1:55.54 1:56.23 1:58.34 Luke Greenbank Luke Greenbank 1:55.89 X
100 breast 59.19 59.92 59.95 Adam Peaty
James Wilby
Adam Peaty
James Wilby
57.87 58.66
200 breast 2:08.05 2:09.35 2:11.00 James Wilby
Ross Murdoch
James Wilby
Ross Murdoch
2:07.49 2:07.96
100 fly 51.24 51.55 51.96 X X X X
200 fly 1:54.63 1:55.42 1:56.71 X James Guy 1:56.51 X
200 IM 1:56.85 1:57.85 2:00.22 Duncan Scott Duncan Scott
Tom Dean
1:56.65 1:58.89
400 IM 4:11.00 4:12.81 4:17.90 Max Litchfield Max Litchfield
Mark Szaranek
4:10.94 4:16.28
4×100 free relay 3:14.47 X
(collective time 3:15.57 from men’s 100m free final)
4×200 free relay 7:09.62 Top 4 men from 200m free final = 7:06.01
4×100 medley relay 3:33.07 Top 4 men from individual event finals = 3:31.63

In This Story

9
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

9 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alec
5 years ago

Every international meet the US has a significantly better team presence than other nations, they would anyway, but these insane selection standards only widen that gap.

The US could choose to do this as well but they don’t, you would think other nations would take note.

Specifically I look back at the men’s 400 free in 2012 when Vanderkaay and Dwyer both swam 3:47s at trials. In London, they ended up finishing 3rd and 5th. With qualifying times similar to those above they would have been left home, what a waste it would have been.

Honest Observer
5 years ago

At least they showed a little more flexibility than the French.

Swimfan867
Reply to  Honest Observer
5 years ago

Flexibility based on the need to distract from poor management? Dan’s comment is quite correct. France, The Brits and Canada should consider taking the best they have while working to improve the next level. Kill the “Olympic Dream” and far too many thinking athletes (and their parents) will move to other sports.

Dan
5 years ago

Have anyone asked themselves how this looks for younger swimmers (children), does it make them more eager to try to swim harder or does it lead to fewer children starting with swimming and does this cause children to quite earlier?

Tim
Reply to  Dan
5 years ago

If you play two sports and one is swimming then this would be a red flag. It proves that being British Champion and having a FINA A cut won’t get you to Worlds or Olympics.

Jeff
Reply to  Tim
5 years ago

I think it depends on your mindset. It may cause you to struggle or really begin to push to better.

Tim
Reply to  Jeff
5 years ago

You don’t think being British Champion and Fina A cut is enough? In the last few years a number of swimmers have been left off teams where they would have made a final or even got a medal (the most egregious example being Euros 2016 where British Champions were left off the team for a home championships because selectors thought they wouldn’t have won an Olympic medal. There were a number of swimmers who missed out on a Euro medal though this. That is unethical and limits competition and peoples ability to make a living.

5wimmer
5 years ago

I think all of those women who were not selected but with fina A times will be offered the opportunity to swim at WUGs so at least have the opportunity to get some competitive international racing this year.

I believe Atkinson is competing at the Island Games in Gibraltar too

Togger
5 years ago

But they were dire in 2012.

British Swimming is funded very well (revenue of nearly £11m last year), as is all elite Olympic sport in the UK, they’re just not producing the same results as the sitting down sports.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »